Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein as Screening and Monitoring Biomarkers for Brain Metastases.
Kim, Su-Hyun; Gwak, Ho-Shin; Lee, Youngjoo; Park, Na-Young; Han, Mira; Kim, Yeseul; Kim, So-Yeon; Kim, Ho Jin.
Afiliação
  • Kim SH; Department of Neurology, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Gwak HS; Department of Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Lee Y; Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Park NY; Department of Neurology, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Han M; Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Kim Y; Department of Neurology, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Kim SY; Department of Neurology, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
  • Kim HJ; Department of Neurology, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(9)2021 May 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34066445
ABSTRACT
We evaluated the potential serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) roles in diagnosing and monitoring brain metastases (BMs). We included 70 patients with newly diagnosed BMs, 71 age- and cancer type-matched patients without BMs, and 67 healthy controls (HCs). We compared sNfL and sGFAP levels among the groups using a single-molecule array immunoassay. We prospectively followed 26 patients with BMs every 2-3 months by measuring sNfL and sGFAP levels and performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The sNfL and the sGFAP levels were higher in patients with BMs (medians sNfL, 63.7 µL; sGFAP, 819.5 pg/µL) than in those without BMs (sNfL, 13.3 µL; sGFAP, 154 pg/µL; p < 0.001) and HCs (sNfL, 12.5 µL; sGFAP, 135 pg/µL; p < 0.001). The sNfL and the sGFAP cutoff levels had a sensitivity and a specificity of 91%. The sGFAP cutoff level had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 97%. The sNfL and the sGFAP levels were related to the BM size but not to the primary cancer type. After BM treatment, sNfL and sGFAP levels decreased with reduced BM lesions on MRI; however, they increased when BMs progressed. sNfL and sGFAP are potential biomarkers for BM screening in cancer patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article