Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
COVID-19 pandemic and population-level pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang, Jie; D'Souza, Rohan; Kharrat, Ashraf; Fell, Deshayne B; Snelgrove, John W; Murphy, Kellie E; Shah, Prakesh S.
Afiliação
  • Yang J; Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • D'Souza R; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kharrat A; Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fell DB; Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Snelgrove JW; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Murphy KE; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Shah PS; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(10): 1756-1770, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096034
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Conflicting reports of increases and decreases in rates of preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic have surfaced. The objective of our study was to conduct a living systematic review and meta-analyses of studies reporting pregnancy and neonatal outcomes by comparing the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We searched PubMed and Embase databases, reference lists of articles published up until 14 May 2021 and included English language studies that compared outcomes between the COVID-19 pandemic time period and pre-pandemic time periods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS:

Thirty-seven studies with low-to-moderate risk of bias, reporting on 1 677 858 pregnancies during the pandemic period and 21 028 650 pregnancies during the pre-pandemic period, were included. There was a significant reduction in unadjusted estimates of PTB (28 studies, unadjusted odds ratio [uaOR] 0.94, 95% confidence [CI] 0.91-0.98) but not in adjusted estimates (six studies, adjusted OR [aOR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.13). The reduction was noted in studies from single centers/health areas (uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94) but not in regional/national studies (uaOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03). There was reduction in spontaneous PTB (five studies, uaOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.98) and induced PTB (four studies, uaOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.00). There was no reduction in PTB when stratified by gestational age <34, <32 or <28 weeks. There was no difference in stillbirths between the pandemic and pre-pandemic time periods (21 studies, uaOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94-1.23; four studies, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81-1.38). There was an increase in birthweight (six studies, mean difference 17 g, 95% CI 7-28 g) during the pandemic period. There was an increase in maternal mortality (four studies, uaOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26), which was mostly influenced by one study from Mexico. There was significant publication bias for the outcome of PTB.

CONCLUSIONS:

The COVID-19 pandemic time period may be associated with a reduction in PTB; however, referral bias cannot be excluded. There was no difference in stillbirth between the pandemic and pre-pandemic period.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resultado da Gravidez / Nascimento Prematuro / Natimorto / COVID-19 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resultado da Gravidez / Nascimento Prematuro / Natimorto / COVID-19 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article