Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 epidemic growth in the 37 OECD member states.
Pozo-Martin, Francisco; Weishaar, Heide; Cristea, Florin; Hanefeld, Johanna; Bahr, Thurid; Schaade, Lars; El Bcheraoui, Charbel.
Afiliação
  • Pozo-Martin F; Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • Weishaar H; Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • Cristea F; Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • Hanefeld J; Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • Bahr T; Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • Schaade L; Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
  • El Bcheraoui C; Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany. El-BcheraouiC@rki.de.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 36(6): 629-640, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114189
We estimated the impact of a comprehensive set of non-pharmeceutical interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic growth rate across the 37 member states of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and between October and December 2020. For this task, we conducted a data-driven, longitudinal analysis using a multilevel modelling approach with both maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation. We found that during the early phase of the epidemic: implementing restrictions on gatherings of more than 100 people, between 11 and 100 people, and 10 people or less was associated with a respective average reduction of 2.58%, 2.78% and 2.81% in the daily growth rate in weekly confirmed cases; requiring closing for some sectors or for all but essential workplaces with an average reduction of 1.51% and 1.78%; requiring closing of some school levels or all school levels with an average reduction of 1.12% or 1.65%; recommending mask wearing with an average reduction of 0.45%, requiring mask wearing country-wide in specific public spaces or in specific geographical areas within the country with an average reduction of 0.44%, requiring mask-wearing country-wide in all public places or all public places where social distancing is not possible with an average reduction of 0.96%; and number of tests per thousand population with an average reduction of 0.02% per unit increase. Between October and December 2020 work closing requirements and testing policy were significant predictors of the epidemic growth rate. These findings provide evidence to support policy decision-making regarding which NPIs to implement to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quarentena / Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico / Distanciamento Físico / COVID-19 / Máscaras Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Quarentena / Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico / Distanciamento Físico / COVID-19 / Máscaras Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article