Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is a cross-connector beneficial for single level traditional or cortical bone trajectory pedicle screw instrumentation?
Cornaz, Frédéric; Widmer, Jonas; Fasser, Marie-Rosa; Snedeker, Jess Gerrit; Matsukawa, Keitaro; Spirig, José Miguel; Farshad, Mazda.
Afiliação
  • Cornaz F; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Widmer J; Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Fasser MR; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Snedeker JG; Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Matsukawa K; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Spirig JM; Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Farshad M; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0253076, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115816
ABSTRACT
The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been introduced with the aim of better screw hold, however, screw-rod constructs with this trajectory might provide less rigidity in lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) compared to the constructs with the traditional trajectory (TT). Therefore, the addition of a horizontal cross-connector could be beneficial in counteracting this possible inferiority. The aim of this study was to compare the primary rigidity of TT with CBT screw-rod constructs and to quantify the effect of cross-connector-augmentation in both. Spines of four human cadavers (T9 -L5) were cropped into 15 functional spine units (FSU). Eight FSUs were instrumented with TT and seven FSUs with CBT pedicle screws. The segments were tested in six loading directions in three configurations uninstrumented, instrumented with and without cross-connector. The motion between the cranial and caudal vertebra was recorded. The range of motion (ROM) between the CBT and the TT group did not differ significantly in either configuration. Cross-connector -augmentation did reduce the ROM in AR (16.3%, 0.27°, p = 0.02), LB (2.9%, 0.07°, p = 0.03) and flexion-extension FE (2.3%, 0.04°, p = 0.02) for the TT group and in AR (20.6%, 0.31°, p = 0.01) for the CBT-group. The primary rigidity of TT and CBT single level screw-rod constructs did not show significant difference. The minimal reduction of ROM due to cross-connector-augmentation seems clinically not relevant. Based on the findings of these study there is no increased necessity to use a cross-connector in a CBT-construct.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Parafusos Pediculares / Osso Cortical Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coluna Vertebral / Parafusos Pediculares / Osso Cortical Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article