Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical impact of MultiPoint pacing in responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Marques, Pedro; Nunes-Ferreira, Afonso; Silvério António, Pedro; Aguiar-Ricardo, Inês; Rodrigues, Tiago; Badie, Nima; Marcos, Ivo; Bernardes, Ana; Pinto, Fausto J; de Sousa, João.
Afiliação
  • Marques P; Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Nunes-Ferreira A; CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Silvério António P; Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Aguiar-Ricardo I; CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Rodrigues T; Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Badie N; CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Marcos I; Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Bernardes A; CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Pinto FJ; Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • de Sousa J; CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 44(9): 1577-1584, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255874
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy demonstrated benefits in heart failure. However, only 60-70% are responders and only 22% are super-responders. MultiPoint pacing (MPP) improves structural remodeling, but data in responder patients is scarce.

METHODS:

A prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of MPP was conducted in patients who were CRT responders after 6 months of bi-ventricular (BiV) therapy. At 6 months, responder patients (LV end-systolic volume [LVESV] reduction ≥15%) were randomized to either continued BiV therapy or to MPP programmed with wide anatomical separation ≥30 mm, and followed until 12 months. Efficacy was determined by 6-12 month changes in LVESV and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Evaluations of super-responder rate (LVESV reduction ≥30%) and quality of life (NYHA, EQ-5D, MLHFQ) were also performed.

RESULTS:

From February 2017 to February 2019, 73 CRTs with Quartet LV leads were implanted (42.9% female, 65.7 ± 10.8 years old, 79.5% dilated cardiomyopathy). At 6 months, 74.2% responded to BiV and were randomized to BiV (n = 25) or MPP (n = 24). MPP versus BiV delivered greater LVESV improvement (8.3% decrease in MPP vs. 10.3% increase in BiV patients, p = .047), greater increase in LVEF (7.7% vs. 1.8%, p = .008), and higher 0-12 month super-responder rate (86.4% vs. 56.0%, p = .027). More MPP vs. BiV patients experienced an improvement in NYHA (84.6% vs. 50.0%, p = .047) and EQ-5D (94.4% vs. 54.0%, p = .006).

CONCLUSIONS:

MPP with wide anatomical spacing in CRT responder patients resulted in improved LV reverse remodeling with higher rates of super-responders, and better quality of life metrics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantação de Prótese / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantação de Prótese / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article