Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic Significance of Nonischemic Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Normal LV Volumes and Ejection-Fraction.
Lota, Amrit S; Tsao, Adam; Owen, Ruth; Halliday, Brian P; Auger, Dominique; Vassiliou, Vassilios S; Tayal, Upasana; Almogheer, Batool; Vilches, Silvia; Al-Balah, Amer; Patel, Akhil; Mouy, Florence; Buchan, Rachel; Newsome, Simon; Gregson, John; Ware, James S; Cook, Stuart A; Cleland, John G F; Pennell, Dudley J; Prasad, Sanjay K.
Afiliação
  • Lota AS; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Tsao A; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
  • Owen R; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Halliday BP; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Auger D; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Vassiliou VS; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, N
  • Tayal U; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Almogheer B; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Vilches S; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Al-Balah A; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
  • Patel A; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Imperial College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mouy F; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Buchan R; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Newsome S; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Gregson J; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ware JS; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, Un
  • Cook SA; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Cleland JGF; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Gl
  • Pennell DJ; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dj.pennell@rbht.nhs.uk.
  • Prasad SK; Cardiovascular Research Centre & Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 14(12): 2353-2365, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34274268
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients without coronary artery disease and with normal range left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND:

Nonischemic patterns of LGE with normal LV volumes and ejection fraction are increasingly detected on cardiovascular magnetic resonance, but their prognostic significance, and consequently management, is uncertain.

METHODS:

Patients with midwall/subepicardial LGE and normal LV volumes, wall thickness, and ejection fraction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance were enrolled and compared to a control group without LGE. The primary outcome was actual or aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD).

RESULTS:

Of 748 patients enrolled, 401 had LGE and 347 did not. The median age was 50 years (interquartile range 38-61 years), LV ejection fraction 66% (interquartile range 62%-70%), and 287 (38%) were women. Scan indications included chest pain (40%), palpitation (33%) and breathlessness (13%). No patient experienced SCD and only 1 LGE+ patient (0.13%) had an aborted SCD in the 11th follow-up year. Over a median of 4.3 years, 30 patients (4.0%) died. All-cause mortality was similar for LGE+/- patients (3.7% vs 4.3%; P = 0.71) and was associated with age (HR 2.04 per 10 years; 95% CI 1.46-2.79; P < 0.001). Twenty-one LGE+ and 4 LGE- patients had an unplanned cardiovascular hospital admission (HR 7.22; 95% CI 4.26-21.17; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was a low SCD risk during long-term follow-up in patients with LGE but otherwise normal LV volumes and ejection fraction. Mortality was driven by age and not LGE presence, location, or extent, although the latter was associated with greater cardiovascular hospitalization for suspected myocarditis and symptomatic ventricular tachycardia.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meios de Contraste / Gadolínio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meios de Contraste / Gadolínio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article