Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Balloon Guide Catheters and Standard Guide Catheters for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pederson, John M; Reierson, Natalie L; Hardy, Nicole; Touchette, Jillienne C; Medam, Sammy; Barrett, Averi; Schmidt, Megan; Brinjikji, Waleed; Kallmes, David F; Kallmes, Kevin M.
Afiliação
  • Pederson JM; Nested Knowledge, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Reierson NL; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Hardy N; Nested Knowledge, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Touchette JC; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Medam S; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Barrett A; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Schmidt M; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Brinjikji W; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Kallmes DF; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Kallmes KM; Nested Knowledge, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA; Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA; Duke University Law School, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: kevin.kallmes@nested-knowledge.com.
World Neurosurg ; 154: 144-153.e21, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34280538
BACKGROUND: Balloon guide catheters (BGCs) are designed to induce flow arrest during mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion and have been associated with improved clinical and angiographic outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the relative technical and clinical outcomes associated with BGC versus non-BGC approaches. METHODS: A systematic review of clinical literature using the PubMed database was undertaken to identify multiarm studies published between 2010 and 2021 reporting the use of BGC versus non-BGC approaches for stroke treatment. Data collected included complete recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, TICI), first-pass effect TICI 3, puncture-to recanalization time, number of endovascular attempts, distal embolization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, and 90-day mortality. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of treatment device (stent-retrievers, contact aspiration, combination therapy, and not specified/other). A random effects model was fit for each outcome measure. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Compared with non-BGC approaches, patients treated with BGCs had greater odds of TICI 3 (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.08-2.29) and first-pass effect TICI 3 (OR 3.63; 95% CI 2.34-5.62), reduced puncture-to-revascularization time (mean difference -7.8; 95% CI -13.3 to -2.2), fewer endovascular attempts (mean difference -0.47; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.26), reduced odds of distal emboli (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.71) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51-0.86), greater odds of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27-1.79), and reduced odds of mortality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: BGCs yield superior technical and clinical outcomes while reducing patient complications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trombectomia / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Oclusão com Balão / Catéteres / AVC Isquêmico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trombectomia / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Oclusão com Balão / Catéteres / AVC Isquêmico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article