Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advantages of Tyrosine Kinase Anti-Angiogenic Cediranib over Bevacizumab: Cell Cycle Abrogation and Synergy with Chemotherapy.
Bi, Jianling; Dixit, Garima; Zhang, Yuping; Devor, Eric J; Losh, Haley A; Newtson, Andreea M; Coleman, Kristen L; Santillan, Donna A; Maretzky, Thorsten; Thiel, Kristina W; Leslie, Kimberly K.
Afiliação
  • Bi J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Dixit G; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Devor EJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Losh HA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Newtson AM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Coleman KL; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Santillan DA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Maretzky T; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Thiel KW; Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
  • Leslie KK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 14(7)2021 Jul 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358108
ABSTRACT
Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in tumor development and metastasis. Both bevacizumab and cediranib have demonstrated activity as single anti-angiogenic agents in endometrial cancer, though subsequent studies of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy failed to improve outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of cediranib and bevacizumab in endometrial cancer models. The cellular effects of bevacizumab and cediranib were examined in endometrial cancer cell lines using extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) phosphorylation, ligand shedding, cell viability, and cell cycle progression as readouts. Cellular viability was also tested in eight patient-derived organoid models of endometrial cancer. Finally, we performed a phosphoproteomic array of 875 phosphoproteins to define the signaling changes related to bevacizumab versus cediranib. Cediranib but not bevacizumab blocked ligand-mediated ERK activation in endometrial cancer cells. In both cell lines and patient-derived organoids, neither bevacizumab nor cediranib alone had a notable effect on cell viability. Cediranib but not bevacizumab promoted marked cell death when combined with chemotherapy. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated an accumulation in mitosis after treatment with cediranib + chemotherapy, consistent with the abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint and subsequent mitotic catastrophe. Molecular analysis of key controllers of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint confirmed its abrogation. Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed that bevacizumab and cediranib had both similar and unique effects on cell signaling that underlie their shared versus individual actions as anti-angiogenic agents. An anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as cediranib has the potential to be superior to bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article