Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcutaneous Electrical Neuromodulation of the Cervical Spinal Cord Depends Both on the Stimulation Intensity and the Degree of Voluntary Activity for Training. A Pilot Study.
Kumru, Hatice; Rodríguez-Cañón, María; Edgerton, Victor R; García, Loreto; Flores, África; Soriano, Ignasi; Opisso, Eloy; Gerasimenko, Yury; Navarro, Xavier; García-Alías, Guillermo; Vidal, Joan.
Afiliação
  • Kumru H; Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a la UAB, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
  • Rodríguez-Cañón M; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Edgerton VR; Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
  • García L; Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a la UAB, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
  • Flores Á; Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia & Insititute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
  • Soriano I; Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a la UAB, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
  • Opisso E; Department of Neurobiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Gerasimenko Y; Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Adscrit a la UAB, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
  • Navarro X; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
  • García-Alías G; Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
  • Vidal J; Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia & Insititute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
J Clin Med ; 10(15)2021 Jul 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34362062
ABSTRACT
Electrical enabling motor control (eEmc) through transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation offers promise in improving hand function. However, it is still unknown which stimulus intensity or which muscle force level could be better for this improvement. Nine healthy individuals received the following

interventions:

(i) eEmc intensities at 80%, 90% and 110% of abductor pollicis brevis motor threshold combined with hand training consisting in 100% handgrip strength; (ii) hand training consisting in 100% and 50% of maximal handgrip strength combined with 90% eEmc intensity. The evaluations included box and blocks test (BBT), maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), F wave persistency, F/M ratio, spinal and cortical motor evoked potentials (MEP), recruitment curves of spinal MEP and cortical MEP and short-interval intracortical inhibition. The results showed that (i) 90% eEmc intensity increased BBT, MVC, F wave persistency, F/M ratio and cortical MEP recruitment curve; 110% eEmc intensity increased BBT, F wave persistency and cortical MEP and recruitment curve of cortical MEP; (ii) 100% handgrip strength training significantly modulated MVC, F wave persistency, F/M wave and cortical MEP recruitment curve in comparison to 50% handgrip strength. In conclusion, eEmc intensity and muscle strength during training both influence the results for neuromodulation at the cervical level.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article