Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and validation of the Methotrexate Experience Questionnaire, a new methotrexate oral treatment adherence tool in rheumatoid arthritis.
Curtis, Jeffrey R; Nebesky, Jan Michael; de Bock, Elodie; de la Loge, Christine; Arnould, Benoit; Davey, Robert; Devenport, Jenny; Pethö-Schramm, Attila.
Afiliação
  • Curtis JR; Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, FOT 802, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. jcurtis@uab.edu.
  • Nebesky JM; Pharmaceuticals Division, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
  • de Bock E; Patient-Centred Outcomes, ICON plc, Lyon, France.
  • de la Loge C; Patient-Centred Outcomes, ICON plc, Lyon, France.
  • Arnould B; Patient-Centred Outcomes, ICON plc, Lyon, France.
  • Davey R; eClinicalHealth Limited, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
  • Devenport J; Pharmaceuticals Division, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Pethö-Schramm A; Pharmaceuticals Division, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 5(1): 69, 2021 Aug 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373947
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Despite the development of new biologic therapies, methotrexate (MTX) remains the preferred initial disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Adherence to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs is suspected to be highly variable potentially leading to reduced treatment effectiveness. This work aimed to develop and validate the Methotrexate Experience Questionnaire (MEQ), a tool to identify and characterize non-adherence to oral MTX.

METHODS:

MEQ development included a literature review and qualitative interviews with RA patients and physicians in the United States. A retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from Optimum Patient Care Research Database, a large primary care database of electronic medical records in the United Kingdom, was conducted to finalize the MEQ and evaluate its psychometric properties.

RESULTS:

Three hundred seven e-consented subjects (66% women, mean age of 65 years) completed the MEQ remotely, and were included in this analysis. Item-convergent and divergent validity were generally supportive of the construct validity of the MEQ and Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 supported its reliability. The MEQ Total score presented statistically significant correlations of small to medium size with all selected concurrent scales, as expected; the highest correlation was obtained between the general acceptance score of ACCEPT and the MEQ Total score (0.55, p < 0.001). Known-groups validity was demonstrated as a logical pattern of higher MEQ scores was obtained for patients considered adherent with both the 6- and 12-month Proportion of Days Covered (mean MEQ total score 82.7 for 12-month PDC ≥ 80% against 76.3 for 12-month PDC < 80%, p< 0.0001). Additionally, a pattern of lower MEQ scores was obtained for patients with more severe disease assessed with Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3.

CONCLUSION:

The 24-item MEQ is a reliable and valid instrument to assess the adherence of RA patients taking MTX, potentially improving over historical refill rate metrics by providing insights into the individual reasons for lack of adherence. This information should facilitate clinician-patient discussions and help inform treatment decisions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article