Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Patients With Active Malignancies.
Schlam, Ilana; Lee, Andy Y; Li, Song; Sheikh, Farooq H; Zaghlol, Raja; Basyal, Binaya; Gallagher, Christopher; Molina, Ezequiel; Mahr, Claudius; Cheng, Richard K; Barac, Ana.
Afiliação
  • Schlam I; MedStar Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Lee AY; Department of Hematology-Oncology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Li S; Department of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Sheikh FH; Department of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Zaghlol R; MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Basyal B; Department of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Gallagher C; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Molina E; Internal Medicine Department, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Mahr C; MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Cheng RK; Department of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Barac A; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
JACC CardioOncol ; 3(2): 305-315, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396339
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are limited data to guide oncology and cardiology decision-making in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and concurrent active malignancy.

OBJECTIVES:

The goal of this study was to describe cancer treatment approaches, complications, and survival among patients with active cancer on LVAD support in 2 tertiary heart failure and oncology programs.

METHODS:

In this retrospective cohort study, LVAD databases were reviewed to identify patients with a cancer diagnosis at the time of or after LVAD implantation. We created a 31 matched cohort based on age, sex, etiology of cardiomyopathy, LVAD implant strategy, and INTERMACS profile stratified by site. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival between patients with cancer and non-cancer comparators.

RESULTS:

Among 1,123 patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2005 and 2019, 22 patients with LVADs with active cancer and 66 matched non-cancer comparators were identified. Median age was 62 years (range 41 to 73 years); 50% of patients with cancer were African-American, and 27% were women. Prostate cancer, followed by renal cell cancer and hematologic malignancies were the most common diagnoses. There was no significant difference in unadjusted Kaplan-Meier median survival estimates from the time of LVAD placement between patients with cancer (3.53 years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 5.33) and non-cancer comparators (3.03 years; 95% CI 1.83 to 5.26; log-rank P = 0.99). In Cox proportional hazard models, cancer diagnosis as a time-varying variable was associated with a statistically significant increase in death (hazard ratio 2.05; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.12; P = 0.04). Patients with cancer had less gastrointestinal bleeding compared with matched non-cancer comparators (P = 0.016). Other complications were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study provides initial feasibility and safety data and set a framework for multidisciplinary team management of patients with cancer and LVADs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article