Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of an in-house trypsin-based method to resolve the interference of daratumumab.
Ibeh, Nnaemeka; Baine, Ian; Rudon, Louella Fuentes; Lomas-Francis, Christine; Jhang, Jeffrey S; Galdon, Patricia; Westhoff, Connie M; Velliquette, Randall W; Arinsburg, Suzanne A.
Afiliação
  • Ibeh N; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
  • Baine I; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
  • Rudon LF; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
  • Lomas-Francis C; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York Blood Center, New York, USA.
  • Jhang JS; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
  • Galdon P; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
  • Westhoff CM; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York Blood Center, New York, USA.
  • Velliquette RW; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York Blood Center, New York, USA.
  • Arinsburg SA; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
Transfusion ; 61(10): 3000-3007, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34472116
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Daratumumab (DARA) is a monoclonal antibody for treatment of plasma cell myeloma targeting CD38, a surface molecule expressed on plasma cells and red blood cells (RBCs). This complicates blood bank testing, requiring dithiothreitol (DTT) to remove DARA interference. A simple in-house method of removing DARA interference without use of DTT, a potentially hazardous chemical, is desirable. We demonstrate a trypsin-based method to remove interference in antibody testing at a medical center (MC), with parallel testing at an immunohematology reference laboratory (IRL). STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Pre-DARA type and screen (T&S) samples were obtained from 61 patients for antibody testing and RBC phenotyping using untreated reagent RBCs. Subsequent post-DARA T&S testing was performed with untreated reagent RBCs to demonstrate interference and repeated after trypsin treatment. Positive trypsin-treated antibody screens were reflexed to antibody identification using trypsin-treated panel cells. Parallel testing was performed on the same post-DARA samples at IRL.

RESULTS:

DARA interference was detected in 61/61 (100%) samples by MC and IRL. After trypsin treatment, DARA interference was eliminated in 60/61 (98.4%) antibody screens by both institutions with an overall percent agreement of 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.7%-99.6%). Identification of known alloantibodies was confirmed in 3/3 patients with 100% concordant results between MC and IRL. There were no false-negative results demonstrated by IRL's functionally CD38-negative controls.

CONCLUSION:

Our in-house trypsin-based method enables pretransfusion testing of patients receiving DARA in an accurate and cost-effective manner without missing clinically significant alloantibodies. This presents an additional testing option where DTT use is undesirable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anticorpos Monoclonais / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anticorpos Monoclonais / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article