Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimisation of the Peer-Led Flipped Model Using TEL Resources Within Neuroanatomy.
Anbu, Deepika; Robson, Alistair; Kurn, Octavia; Taylor, Charles; Dean, Oliver; Payne, December; Nagy, Eva; Harrison, Charlotte; Hall, Samuel; Border, Scott.
Afiliação
  • Anbu D; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Robson A; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Kurn O; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Taylor C; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Dean O; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Payne D; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Nagy E; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Harrison C; Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Hall S; University Hospital Southampton, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Border S; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. s.border@soton.ac.uk.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1334: 1-22, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476742
ABSTRACT
The flipped classroom (where students prepare before and then develop understanding during class) and technology-enhanced learning (audio-visual learning tools) are increasingly used to supplement anatomy teaching. However, the supporting literature lacks robust methodology and is conflicting in demonstrating efficacy outcomes. Contrastingly, near-peer teaching (where senior students teach juniors on the same academic programme) is well researched and reported to be both effective and versatile. This provides an ideal vehicle in which to investigate and potentially optimise these approaches.This study aims to assess educational impact of the peer-led flipped model and student engagement and perceptions regarding traditional and TEL resources.A quasi-randomised, cross-sectional study was conducted with 281 second-year University of Southampton medical students. Students were randomly allocated to 3 groups traditional lecture (control), flipped text resource, or flipped video resource. The first group received no pre-teaching material, but the flipped groups received a text or video pre-teaching resource. Objective outcomes measured were Knowledge gain and retention via multiple-choice questionnaires and formative exams Student perceptions and engagement using questionnaires and 2 focus groups All groups demonstrated significant knowledge gain post-teaching (p < 0.0001). However, regardless of engagement with pre-teaching material, no significant difference was found in knowledge gain or retention between the groups. Students engaged 21.1% more with the text rather than video resource (p = 0.0019), but spent equal time using both (p = 0.0948). All resources and teaching approaches were perceived 'very useful' with no significant differences found between groups. A qualitative approach utilising thematic analysis of focus groups identified 4 themes, including 'Attitudes towards flipped classroom', which revealed mixed reviews and perceptions from participants.This study has found the peer-led flipped model is of no detriment to educational impact compared to peer-led traditional approaches in a well-established peer teaching programme in undergraduate medicine at the University of Southampton. Students value traditional and video resources but engage with them differently. Additionally, it was reported that in this experiment, NPT did not seem well suited to the flipped classroom, suggesting a rare limitation of the utility of NPT application within an anatomy curriculum.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Neuroanatomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Neuroanatomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article