Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PTEN and DNA Ploidy Status by Machine Learning in Prostate Cancer.
Cyll, Karolina; Kleppe, Andreas; Kalsnes, Joakim; Vlatkovic, Ljiljana; Pradhan, Manohar; Kildal, Wanja; Tobin, Kari Anne R; Reine, Trine M; Wæhre, Håkon; Brennhovd, Bjørn; Askautrud, Hanne A; Skaaheim Haug, Erik; Hveem, Tarjei S; Danielsen, Håvard E.
Afiliação
  • Cyll K; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Kleppe A; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Kalsnes J; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
  • Vlatkovic L; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Pradhan M; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Kildal W; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Tobin KAR; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Reine TM; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Wæhre H; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Brennhovd B; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Askautrud HA; Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Skaaheim Haug E; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Hveem TS; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Danielsen HE; Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, NO-3103 Tønsberg, Norway.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(17)2021 Aug 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503100
ABSTRACT
Machine learning (ML) is expected to improve biomarker assessment. Using convolution neural networks, we developed a fully-automated method for assessing PTEN protein status in immunohistochemically-stained slides using a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort (n = 253). It was validated according to a predefined protocol in an independent RP cohort (n = 259), alone and by measuring its prognostic value in combination with DNA ploidy status determined by ML-based image cytometry. In the primary analysis, automatically assessed dichotomized PTEN status was associated with time to biochemical recurrence (TTBCR) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.32, 95% CI 2.05 to 5.38). Patients with both non-diploid tumors and PTEN-low had an HR of 4.63 (95% CI 2.50 to 8.57), while patients with one of these characteristics had an HR of 1.94 (95% CI 1.15 to 3.30), compared to patients with diploid tumors and PTEN-high, in univariable analysis of TTBCR in the validation cohort. Automatic PTEN scoring was strongly predictive of the PTEN status assessed by human experts (area under the curve 0.987 (95% CI 0.968 to 0.994)). This suggests that PTEN status can be accurately assessed using ML, and that the combined marker of automatically assessed PTEN and DNA ploidy status may provide an objective supplement to the existing risk stratification factors in prostate cancer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article