Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of the SOLO1 and PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trials evaluating maintenance olaparib or bevacizumab or the combination of both in newly diagnosed, advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer.
Vergote, Ignace; Ray-Coquard, Isabelle; Anderson, Daniel M; Cantuaria, Guilherme; Colombo, Nicoletta; Garnier-Tixidre, Claire; Gilbert, Lucy; Harter, Philipp; Hettle, Robert; Lorusso, Domenica; Mäenpää, Johanna; Marth, Christian; Matsumoto, Koji; Ouwens, Mario; Poveda, Andrés; Raspagliesi, Francesco; Rhodes, Kirsty; Rubio Pérez, María J; Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie; Shikama, Ayumi; Sikorska, Magdalena; Moore, Kathleen; DiSilvestro, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Vergote I; University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium, European Union; Belgian and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Belgium, European Union. Electronic address: ignace.vergote@uzleuven.be.
  • Ray-Coquard I; Centre Léon BERARD and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), France.
  • Anderson DM; Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park, MN, USA.
  • Cantuaria G; Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Colombo N; University of Milan-Bicocca and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group (MANGO), Italy.
  • Garnier-Tixidre C; Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), France; Institut Daniel Hollard, Grenoble, France.
  • Gilbert L; McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Harter P; Ev. Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Studiengruppe, Germany.
  • Hettle R; AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Lorusso D; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Italy.
  • Mäenpää J; Tampere University and University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO), Finland.
  • Marth C; Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; AGO-Austria, Austria.
  • Matsumoto K; Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.
  • Ouwens M; AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Poveda A; Initia Oncology, Hospital Quirónsalud, Valencia, Spain; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Spain.
  • Raspagliesi F; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Rhodes K; AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Rubio Pérez MJ; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Spain; Reina Sofia Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Shapira-Frommer R; Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Shikama A; University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan; Gynecologic Oncology Trial and Investigation Consortium (GOTIC), Japan.
  • Sikorska M; Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny w Olsztynie, Olsztyn, Poland.
  • Moore K; Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  • DiSilvestro P; Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Eur J Cancer ; 157: 415-423, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34597975
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the absence of randomised head-to-head trials, we conducted a population-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (PA-ITC) of phase III trial data to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab alone and in combination in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm).

METHODS:

An unanchored PA-ITC was performed on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) data. Individual patient data from SOLO1 (olaparib versus placebo) and from BRCA-mutated patients in PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab) were pooled. Each arm of PAOLA-1 was weighted so that key baseline patient characteristics were similar to the SOLO1 cohort. Analyses were performed in patients with complete baseline data. Weighted Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of different maintenance therapy strategies, supplemented by weighted Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS:

Data from SOLO1 patients (olaparib, n = 254; placebo, n = 126) were compared with data from BRCA-mutated PAOLA-1 patients (olaparib plus bevacizumab, n = 151; placebo plus bevacizumab, n = 71). Adding bevacizumab to olaparib was associated with a numerical improvement in PFS compared with olaparib alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.09). Statistically significant improvements in PFS were seen with olaparib alone versus placebo plus bevacizumab (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.30-0.75), olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo (0.23; 0.14-0.34), and placebo plus bevacizumab versus placebo (0.65; 0.43-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS:

Results of this hypothesis-generating PA-ITC analysis support the use of maintenance olaparib alone or with bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCAm.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Ftalazinas / Piperazinas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Bevacizumab / Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Ftalazinas / Piperazinas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Bevacizumab / Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article