Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computed tomography-guided partial-breast brachytherapy using implanted catheters as fiducial markers versus co-registered magnetic resonance imaging.
Sato, Kazuhiko; Shimo, Takahiro; Kato, Masahiro; Natsume, Nana; Fuchikami, Hiromi; Takeda, Naoko; Okawa, Tomohiko.
Afiliação
  • Sato K; Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: kazsato.boc@gmail.com.
  • Shimo T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kato M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Natsume N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fuchikami H; Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takeda N; Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Okawa T; Preventive Medical Center, Sano City Hospital, Sano, Tochigi, Japan.
Brachytherapy ; 20(6): 1219-1225, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34602344
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Partial-breast irradiation (PBI) needs accurate cavity delineation with computed tomography (CT). In perioperative PBI using multicatheter-interstitial brachytherapy (MIB), catheters implanted during surgery were enabled as fiducial markers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also assist delineation with CT.

METHODS:

Patients receiving MIB-PBI were analyzed. Cavity visualization scores (CVSs) were categorized with CT. With catheter-based delineation (CBD), the relationship between cavity boundaries and catheters were used to contour the tumor bed. Co-registered MRI delineation (CMD) was also performed. The correlation between cavity volume and the excised tissue weight was compared for the two techniques.

RESULTS:

The association between CVS and preoperative characteristics in 159 patients showed mammographic breast density (MBD) remained correlated to CVS on multiple regression analyses; CVS = 5.2-0.61 x MBD (p < 0.0001). In 43 patients, the cavity volumes determined with CBD vs CMD were 12.8 ±â€¯6.4 cm3 vs 16.1 ±â€¯12.4 cm3 (p < 0.0001), and their plots with excised weights showed the best fitting lines were 0.29 vs 0.48 (p < 0.0001), respectively. The correlation coefficients for CBD vs CMD were 0.65 vs 0.55 (p = 0.20) in low (CVS 1-3, n = 27) and 0.72 vs 0.58 (p = 0.36) in high visualized cavities (CVS 4-5, n = 16), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of implanted catheters as fiducial markers was associated with smaller cavities and greater correlations with the excised tissue weights than co-registration with MRI. This might be a useful technique, especially for patients with dense breasts on mammography.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article