Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Value of Three Combined Ultrasonography Modalities in Predicting the Risk of Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Zhang, Qing; Agyekum, Enock Adjei; Zhu, Linna; Yan, Lingling; Zhang, Lei; Wang, Xian; Yin, Liang; Qian, Xiaoqin.
Afiliação
  • Zhang Q; Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Agyekum EA; School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Zhu L; Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Yan L; Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Zhang L; Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Yin L; Department of Breast Surgery, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
  • Qian X; Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, China.
Front Oncol ; 11: 715097, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34631542
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the clinical value of conventional ultrasound (C-US), ultrasound elastography (UE), percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (P-CUES), and the combination of these three ultrasonography modalities for evaluating the risk of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 120 patients with pathologically confirmed IDC who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Based on the gold standard of postoperative pathology, ALN pathology results were evaluated and compared with findings obtained using C-US, UE, P-CUES, and the three modalities combined. RESULTS: (1) There was a statistically significant difference between the histological grade of the tumor and the pathological condition of ALNs. (2) The difference between C-US parameters and UE score were statistically significant. The accuracy of P-CEUS localization of SLNs was 100% (96/96) when compared with localization guided by methylene blue. The difference in the distribution of the four SLN enhancement patterns was statistically significant. (3) The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of C-US and UE were 75%, 71%, 58%, and 89%, and 71%, 72%, 50%, and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of P-CUES were 91%, 82%, 78%, 92%, respectively. When all three modalities were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94%, 89%, 86%, and 95%, respectively. In the detection of ALN metastasis, there was a good correlation between histopathological results and evaluations based on the three combined ultrasonography modalities (kappa: 0.82, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to C-US, UE, or P-CEUS alone, the combination of the three ultrasonography modalities was found to be superior in distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic ALNs. This combined strategy may aid physicians in determining the most appropriate approach to ALN surgery as well as the prognosis of breast IDC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article