Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dispatcher-assisted conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes for paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
Goto, Yoshikazu; Funada, Akira; Maeda, Tetsuo; Goto, Yumiko.
Afiliação
  • Goto Y; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Takaramachi 13-1, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan. Electronic address: gotoyosh@med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.
  • Funada A; Department of Cardiology, Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Tukumodai.1-1-6, Suita 565-0862, Japan.
  • Maeda T; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Takaramachi 13-1, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan.
  • Goto Y; Department of Cardiology, Yawata Medical Center, Yawata I 12-7, Komatsu 923-8551, Japan.
Resuscitation ; 172: 106-114, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34648920
ABSTRACT

AIM:

As asphyxial cardiac arrest is more common than cardiac arrest from a primary cardiac event in paediatric cardiac arrest, effective ventilation is important during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to determine optimal dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions for bystanders after paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS:

We analysed the records of 8172 children who received bystander dispatcher-assisted CPR. Data were obtained from an All-Japan Utstein-style registry from 2005 to 2017. Patients were divided into conventional CPR and compression-only CPR groups. The primary study endpoint was 1-month neurologically intact survival, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 (CPC 1-2).

RESULTS:

The 1-month CPC 1-2 rate was significantly higher in the dispatcher-assisted conventional CPR group than in the dispatcher-assisted compression-only CPR group (before propensity score matching, 5.7% [175/3077] vs. 3.1% [160/5095], p < 0.0001, adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval 1.19-3.22; after propensity score matching, 6.0% [156/2618] vs. 2.6% [69/2618], p < 0.0001, adjusted odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.76-3.32). In most subgroup analyses after matching, dispatcher-assisted conventional CPR had a higher CPC 1-2 rate than dispatcher-assisted compression-only CPR; however, CPC 1-2 rates were similar between the two groups for patients with an initial shockable rhythm, those with total prehospital CPR time ≥ 20 min, those receiving public access defibrillation, advanced airway management, or adrenaline administration.

CONCLUSION:

Within the limitations of this retrospective observational study, dispatcher-assisted conventional CPR was preferable to dispatcher-assisted compression-only CPR as optimal CPR instructions for coaching callers to perform bystander CPR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article