Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting neurological outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest with multiscale deep neural networks.
Zheng, Wei-Long; Amorim, Edilberto; Jing, Jin; Ge, Wendong; Hong, Shenda; Wu, Ona; Ghassemi, Mohammad; Lee, Jong Woo; Sivaraju, Adithya; Pang, Trudy; Herman, Susan T; Gaspard, Nicolas; Ruijter, Barry J; Sun, Jimeng; Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C; Hofmeijer, Jeannette; van Putten, Michel J A M; Westover, M Brandon.
Afiliação
  • Zheng WL; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: weilonglive@gmail.com.
  • Amorim E; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Jing J; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ge W; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hong S; Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
  • Wu O; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ghassemi M; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Lee JW; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Sivaraju A; Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Pang T; Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Herman ST; Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Gaspard N; Department of Neurology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Ruijter BJ; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
  • Sun J; Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
  • Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC; Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
  • Hofmeijer J; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
  • van Putten MJAM; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
  • Westover MB; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mwestover@mgh.harvard.edu.
Resuscitation ; 169: 86-94, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34699925
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool for neurological outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. However, the complexity of continuous EEG data limits timely and accurate interpretation by clinicians. We develop a deep neural network (DNN) model to leverage complex EEG trends for early and accurate assessment of cardiac arrest coma recovery likelihood.

METHODS:

We developed a multiscale DNN combining convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (long short-term memory [LSTM]) using EEG and demographic information (age, gender, shockable rhythm) from a multicenter cohort of 1,038 cardiac arrest patients. The CNN learns EEG feature representations while the multiscale LSTM captures short-term and long-term EEG dynamics on multiple time scales. Poor outcome is defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-5 and good outcome as CPC score 1-2 at 3-6 months after cardiac arrest. Performance is evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration error.

RESULTS:

Model performance increased with EEG duration, with AUC increasing from 0.83 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.79-0.87 at 12h to 0.91 (95%CI 0.88-0.93) at 66h. Sensitivity of good and poor outcome prediction was 77% and 75% at a specificity of 90%, respectively. Sensitivity of poor outcome was 50% at a specificity of 99%. Predicted probability was well matched to the observation frequency of poor outcomes, with a calibration error of 0.11 [0.09-0.14].

CONCLUSIONS:

These results demonstrate that incorporating EEG evolution over time improves the accuracy of neurologic outcome prediction for patients with coma after cardiac arrest.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coma / Parada Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coma / Parada Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article