Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variation in practice for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis: a survey from an academic tertiary referral center in the United States.
Ailaney, Nikhil; Zielinski, Elizabeth; Doll, Michelle; Bearman, Gonzalo M; Kates, Stephen L; Golladay, Gregory J.
Afiliação
  • Ailaney N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 1200 Broad Street, 9th Floor, VA, 23298, Richmond, USA. nikhil_ailaney@urmc.rochester.edu.
  • Zielinski E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, VA, 23298, Richmond, USA.
  • Doll M; Department of Infectious Disease, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, VA, 23298, Richmond, USA.
  • Bearman GM; Department of Infectious Disease, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, VA, 23298, Richmond, USA.
  • Kates SL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, VA, 23298, Richmond, USA.
  • Golladay GJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, VA, 23298, Richmond, USA.
Patient Saf Surg ; 15(1): 36, 2021 Oct 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706755
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic surgical prophylaxis is a core strategy for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Despite best practice guidelines and known efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing SSI risk, there is often wide variation in its use. This study was designed to determine the individual perspectives of perioperative providers at an academic tertiary referral center regarding their knowledge of preoperative antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing. METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted amongst surgical and anesthesia team members involved in preoperative antibiotic decision making. The survey addressed ten key principles relating to preoperative antibiotic use, including antibiotic choice, timing and rate of infusion, and dosing. The survey was distributed among orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and anesthesia providers at their respective monthly service line meetings between August 2017 to June 2019. The data was stored and analyzed in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. RESULTS: A total of 73 providers completed the survey. Twenty-two (30 %) of the providers agreed and 47 (64 %) disagreed that both vancomycin and cefazolin are equally effective for antibiotic prophylaxis. As for antibiotic choice in patients with penicillin allergies, 37 (51 %) agreed with vancomycin, 21 (29 %) agreed with clindamycin, and 15 (21 %) disagreed with both alternatives. When providers were surveyed regarding the appropriateness of standard versus weight adjusted dosing, 67 (92 %) agreed that vancomycin should be weight adjusted and 63 (86 %) agreed that cefazolin should be weight adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear consensus amongst providers for which antibiotic to administer for antibiotic prophylaxis despite existing guidelines. Discrepancy also exists between orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia providers in regards to appropriate antibiotic choice for patients with reported penicillin allergies. Institutions should implement evidence-based protocols for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and continue to prospectively monitor compliance in order to identify any inconsistencies that could result in inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article