Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of self-management interventions in people with a stoma.
Goodman, William; Allsop, Matthew; Downing, Amy; Munro, Julie; Taylor, Claire; Hubbard, Gill; Beeken, Rebecca J.
Afiliação
  • Goodman W; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Allsop M; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Downing A; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Munro J; Department of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.
  • Taylor C; London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Hubbard G; Department of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.
  • Beeken RJ; School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
J Adv Nurs ; 78(3): 722-738, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34708416
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Explore the evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effect of self-management interventions on quality of life, self-management skills and self-efficacy, and to explore which intervention characteristics are associated with effectiveness.

DESIGN:

Systematic review. DATA SOURCES A search of the literature was conducted in these databases MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID) and PsychINFO (OVID) from January 2000 to February 2020. REVIEW

METHODS:

Studies were included if participants had a bowel stoma, were over the age of 18 and the design was a randomized controlled trial of a self-management programme. The outcome measures for this review were quality of life, self-management skills and self-efficacy. The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy was used to code interventions for underlying components and alongside other intervention characteristics, associations with improvements in outcomes were explored.

RESULTS:

The search identified 3141 articles, 16 of which were eligible. A meta-analysis of self-efficacy scores from five studies (N = 536) found an improvement in those that received the self-management intervention at follow-up with a 12-point mean difference compared with the usual care group. Effects on quality of life and self-management skills were mixed, and meta-analyses of these data were not possible. Across 13 studies an average of 10 behaviour change techniques were used with, credible source (e.g. nurse, doctor, therapist) (n = 13), instruction on how to perform the behaviour (n = 13), demonstration of the behaviour (n = 12) used most often. The behaviour change technique of self-monitoring was associated with an improvement in quality of life. The involvement of a nurse was associated with higher self-efficacy and self-management skills.

CONCLUSION:

This review suggests that self-management interventions can increase peoples' self-efficacy for managing their stoma. IMPACT A standardized approach to the reporting of interventions and the measures used is needed in future studies to better understand the effect on quality of life and self-management skills.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autogestão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autogestão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article