Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resection of the proximal femur during one-stage revision for infected hip arthroplasty : risk factors and effectiveness.
Abdelaziz, Hussein; Schröder, Michael; Shum Tien, Calvin; Ibrahim, Kahled; Gehrke, Thorsten; Salber, Jochen; Citak, Mustafa.
Afiliação
  • Abdelaziz H; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Schröder M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Shum Tien C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Ibrahim K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Gehrke T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Salber J; Department of Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital, Bochum, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Citak M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(11): 1678-1685, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719276
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions.

METHODS:

In this single-centre, case-control study, 57 patients who underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the hip and required resection of the proximal femur between 2009 and 2018 were identified. The control group consisted of 57 patients undergoing one-stage revision without bony resection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any correlation with resection and the risk factors for re-revisions. Rates of all-causes re-revision, reinfection, and instability were compared between groups.

RESULTS:

Patients who required resection of the proximal femur were found to have a higher all-cause re-revision rate (29.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.018), largely due to reinfection (15.8% vs 0%; p = 0.003), and dislocation (8.8% vs 10.5%; p = 0.762), and showed higher rate of in-hospital wound haematoma requiring aspiration or evacuation (p = 0.013), and wound revision (p = 0.008). The use of of dual mobility components/constrained liner in the resection group was higher than that of controls (94.7% vs 36.8%; p < 0.001). The presence and removal of additional metal hardware (odds ratio (OR) = 7.2), a sinus tract (OR 4), ten years' time interval between primary implantation and index infection (OR 3.3), and previous hip revision (OR 1.4) increased the risk of proximal femoral resection. A sinus tract (OR 9.2) and postoperative dislocation (OR 281.4) were associated with increased risk of subsequent re-revisions.

CONCLUSION:

Proximal femoral resection during one-stage revision hip arthroplasty for PJI may be required to reduce the risk of of recurrent or further infection. Patients with additional metalware needing removal or transcortical sinus tracts and chronic osteomyelitis are particularly at higher risk of needing proximal femoral excision. However, radical resection is associated with higher surgical complications and increased re-revision rates. The use of constrained acetabular liners and dual mobility components maintained an acceptable dislocation rate. These results, including identified risk factors, may aid in preoperative planning, patient consultation and consent, and intraoperative decision-making. Cite this article Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11)1678-1685.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Fêmur Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Artroplastia de Quadril / Fêmur Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article