Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Marizomib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Phase I/II clinical trial data.
Bota, Daniela A; Mason, Warren; Kesari, Santosh; Magge, Rajiv; Winograd, Benjamin; Elias, Ileana; Reich, Steven D; Levin, Nancy; Trikha, Mohit; Desjardins, Annick.
Afiliação
  • Bota DA; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Mason W; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kesari S; John Wayne Cancer Institute and Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
  • Magge R; Weill Cornell Brain Tumor Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Winograd B; Formerly Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA.
  • Elias I; Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  • Reich SD; Triphase Accelerator Corporation, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Levin N; Triphase Accelerator Corporation, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Trikha M; Triphase Accelerator Corporation, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Desjardins A; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Neurooncol Adv ; 3(1): vdab142, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34729484
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This phase I/II trial in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of marizomib, an irreversible pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood-brain barrier.

METHODS:

Part A assessed the safety and efficacy of marizomib monotherapy. In Part B, escalating doses of marizomib (0.5-0.8 mg/m2) in combination with bevacizumab were evaluated. Part C explored intra-patient dose escalation of marizomib (0.8-1.0 mg/m2) for the combination.

RESULTS:

In Part A, 30 patients received marizomib monotherapy. The most common AEs were fatigue (66.7%), headache (46.7%), hallucination (43.3%), and insomnia (43.3%). One patient (3.3%) achieved a partial response. In Part B, the recommended phase II dose of marizomib was 0.8 mg/m2 when combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. In Part C, dose escalation to 1.0 mg/m2 was not tolerated. Pooled analysis of 67 patients treated with marizomib ≤0.8 mg/m2 and bevacizumab showed a nonoverlapping safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of each agent the most common grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (16.4%), confusion (13.4%), headache (10.4%), and fatigue (10.4%). The overall response rate was 34.3%, including 2 patients with complete response. Six-month progression-free survival was 29.8%; median overall survival was 9.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

The safety profile of marizomib as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab was consistent with previous observations that marizomib crosses the blood-brain barrier. Preliminary efficacy did not demonstrate a meaningful benefit of the addition of marizomib to bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent GBM.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article