Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pressure Difference Estimation in Non-stenotic Carotid Bifurcation Phantoms Using Vector Flow Imaging.
Nguyen, Tin-Quoc; Traberg, Marie Sand; Olesen, Jacob Bjerring; Moshavegh, Ramin; Møller-Sørensen, Peter Hasse; Lönn, Lars; Jensen, Jørgen Arendt; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann; Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen TQ; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: tinqnguyen@gmail.com.
  • Traberg MS; Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Olesen JB; BK Medical Aps, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Moshavegh R; BK Medical Aps, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Møller-Sørensen PH; Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lönn L; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Jensen JA; Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Nielsen MB; Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Hansen KL; Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 48(2): 346-357, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34763906
ABSTRACT
Local pressure differences estimated using vector flow imaging (VFI) and direct catheterization in seven carotid bifurcation phantoms were compared with simulated pressure fields. VFI correlated strongly with simulated peak pressure differences (r = 0.99, p < 0.00001), with an average overestimation of 12.3 Pa (28.6%). The range between the lowest and highest pressure difference of VFI underestimated simulations by 4.6 Pa (8.06%; r = 0.99, p < 0.0001). The catheter method exhibited no correlation (r = -0.09, p = 0.85). Ten repeated measurements on one phantom revealed a small standard deviation (SD) for VFI (SD = 8.4%, mean estimated SD = 11.5%), but not for the catheter method (SD = 785.6%). An in vivo peak systolic pressure difference of 97.9 Pa (estimated SD = 30%) was measured using VFI in one healthy individual. This study indicates that VFI pressure difference estimation is feasible in phantoms and in vivo and realistic estimates of the SD can be attained from the data.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artérias Carótidas / Pescoço Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artérias Carótidas / Pescoço Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article