Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pharmacological interventions for periorificial (perioral) dermatitis in children and adults: a systematic review.
Gray, N A; Tod, B; Rohwer, A; Fincham, L; Visser, W I; McCaul, M.
Afiliação
  • Gray NA; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Tygerberg Academic Hospital and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Tod B; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Tygerberg Academic Hospital and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Rohwer A; Centre for Evidence Based Health Care (CEBHC), Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Fincham L; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Visser WI; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Tygerberg Academic Hospital and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • McCaul M; Centre for Evidence Based Health Care (CEBHC), Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(3): 380-390, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34779023
ABSTRACT
The plethora of pharmacologic treatments used for periorificial dermatitis (POD) makes clinical decision-making challenging. The objectives of this review were to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for POD in children and adults. The search was performed on 2 February 2021 and included seven databases and trial registries, with no date or language restrictions Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently and in duplicate by two authors, in accordance with a prespecified protocol. Meta-analyses were performed and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Where meta-analysis was not possible, a narrative synthesis was performed and reported in accordance with SWiM guidelines. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Eleven studies representing 733 participants were included. Oral tetracycline may improve physician-reported severity of POD from day 20 onwards (low certainty evidence). Adverse effects may include abdominal discomfort, facial dryness and pruritus. Pimecrolimus cream may improve physician-reported severity slightly after 4 weeks of treatment (MD -0.49, 95% CI -1.02 to 0.04, n = 164, low certainty evidence). Adverse effects may include erythema, herpes simplex virus infection, burning and pruritus. Azelaic acid gel may result in no change in either physician- or patient-reported severity after 6 weeks of treatment. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of praziquantel ointment on physician-reported severity and skin-related quality of life after 4 weeks of treatment. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of topical clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide on physician-reported severity. The body of evidence to inform treatment of POD currently consists of low and very low certainty evidence for important outcomes. Well-designed trials are needed to further investigate treatment options. Data are required for children and from low-middle income countries to improve external validity. Future trials should also include adequate post-treatment follow-up and standardized outcome measures.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Dermatite Perioral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Dermatite Perioral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article