Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the effects and safety of dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate versus brimonidine after neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy posterior capsule opacification.
Çakmak, Kaan; Erbil, Hasan; Mesci, Cem; Korkmaz, Safak.
Afiliação
  • Çakmak K; Department of Ophthalmology, 121595Düzce State Hospital, Düzce, Turkey.
  • Erbil H; Department of Ophthalmology, 64071Goztepe Training and research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Mesci C; Department of Ophthalmology, 162155Kavacik Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Korkmaz S; Department of Ophthalmology, 121595Düzce State Hospital, Düzce, Turkey.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 32(5): 2928-2934, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791912
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Posterior capsular opacification is treated using neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy that leads to increased intraocular pressure. Here, we compare the effects of dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate versus brimonidine on intraocular pressure. We also investigate their side effects after neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy. In these patients, there are no prior studies comparing the results of these two drugs. MATERIALS Ninety patients with posterior capsule opacification contributed to the study. They received yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy. After yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy, they were randomized into three groups. Group 1 received dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate; Group 2 took brimonidine; and Group 3, the control group, took no drug. Group 1 took dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate eye drops 1 h before the procedure and on the third hour of the first day and two times per day between the second and the seventh days. Group 2 took brimonidine eye drops 1 h before the procedure and on the third hour of the first day, two times per day between the second and the seventh days.

RESULTS:

Brimonidine had a similar side effect profile to the fix combination. Intraocular pressure on the first (p = 0.87) and third days (p = 0.124) were similar in Group 1 (dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate), Group 2 (brimonidine) and the control group. The mean intraocular pressure value of the control group was significantly higher than Groups 1 and 2 because the anti-glaucomatous effects of the drugs become prominent on the seventh day (p = 0.041). In Group 1 and Group 2, intraocular pressure was significantly lower than the control group on the seventh day (p = 0.041). Stinging, itching, hyperemia and Tyndall rates were similar in Group 1, Group 2 and the control group. Watery eyes were less common in the brimonidine group than in the dorzolamide hydrochloride-timolol maleate and the control groups on the seventh day (p = 0.02). Brimonidine also significantly lowered the chemosis rate on the third (p = 0.04) and seventh (p = 0.03) days.

CONCLUSION:

We suggest that brimonidine and a combination of dorzolamide + timolol are similarly effective at reducing eye pressure for routine cases. In cases where intraocular pressure attacks might be at higher risk, using the dorzolamide + timolol combination would be more appropriate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sulfonamidas / Tiofenos / Timolol / Hipertensão Ocular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sulfonamidas / Tiofenos / Timolol / Hipertensão Ocular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article