Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Multiparametric MR-Based RadioFusionOmics Model with Robust Capabilities of Differentiating Glioblastoma Multiforme from Solitary Brain Metastasis.
Wu, Jialiang; Liang, Fangrong; Wei, Ruili; Lai, Shengsheng; Lv, Xiaofei; Luo, Shiwei; Wu, Zhe; Chen, Huixian; Zhang, Wanli; Zeng, Xiangling; Ye, Xianghua; Wu, Yong; Wei, Xinhua; Jiang, Xinqing; Zhen, Xin; Yang, Ruimeng.
Afiliação
  • Wu J; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Liang F; Department of Radiology, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China.
  • Wei R; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
  • Lai S; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Lv X; School of Medical Equipment, Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou 510520, China.
  • Luo S; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China.
  • Wu Z; Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Zhang W; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Zeng X; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Ye X; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Wu Y; Department of Radiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou 516001, China.
  • Wei X; Department of Radiation Oncology, 1st Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China.
  • Jiang X; Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Zhen X; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
  • Yang R; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(22)2021 Nov 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34830943
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a novel RFO model in differentiating GBM and SBM with multiparametric MR sequences collected from 244 (131 GBM and 113 SBM) patients. Three basic volume of interests (VOIs) were delineated on the conventional axial MR images (T1WI, T2WI, T2_FLAIR, and CE_T1WI), including volumetric non-enhanced tumor (nET), enhanced tumor (ET), and peritumoral edema (pTE). Using the RFO model, radiomics features extracted from different multiparametric MRI sequence(s) and VOI(s) were fused and the best sequence and VOI, or possible combinations, were determined. A multi-disciplinary team (MDT)-like fusion was performed to integrate predictions from the high-performing models for the final discrimination of GBM vs. SBM. Image features extracted from the volumetric ET (VOIET) had dominant predictive performances over features from other VOI combinations. Fusion of VOIET features from the T1WI and T2_FLAIR sequences via the RFO model achieved a discrimination accuracy of AUC = 0.925, accuracy = 0.855, sensitivity = 0.856, and specificity = 0.853, on the independent testing cohort 1, and AUC = 0.859, accuracy = 0.836, sensitivity = 0.708, and specificity = 0.919 on the independent testing cohort 2, which significantly outperformed three experienced radiologists (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.01, and p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.45, and 0.02, respectively) and the MDT-decision result of three experienced experts (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.02, and p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.44, and 0.03, respectively).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article