Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do Rotavirus Strains Affect Vaccine Effectiveness? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Cates, Jordan E; Amin, Avnika B; Tate, Jacqueline E; Lopman, Ben; Parashar, Umesh.
Afiliação
  • Cates JE; From the Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Amin AB; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Tate JE; Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA.
  • Lopman B; From the Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Parashar U; Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(12): 1135-1143, 2021 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34870393
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rotavirus causes 215,000 deaths from severe childhood diarrhea annually. Concerns exist that a monovalent vaccine (RV1) and a pentavalent vaccine (RV5) may be less effective against rotavirus strains not contained in the vaccines. We estimated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of RV1 and RV5 against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by vaccine (homotypic) and nonvaccine (partially and fully heterotypic) strains.

METHODS:

After conducting a systematic review, we meta-analyzed 31 case-control studies (N = 27,293) conducted between 2006 and 2020 using a random-effects regression model.

RESULTS:

In high-income countries, RV1 VE was 10% lower against partially heterotypic (P = 0.04) and fully heterotypic (P = 0.10) compared with homotypic strains (homotypic VE 90% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 82-94]; partially heterotypic VE 79% [95% CI 71-85]; fully heterotypic VE 80% [95% CI 65-88]). In middle-income countries, RV1 VE was 14-16% lower against partially heterotypic (P = 0.06) and fully heterotypic (P = 0.04) compared with homotypic strains (homotypic VE 81% [95% CI 69-88]; partially heterotypic VE 67% [95% CI 54-76]; fully heterotypic VE 65% [95% CI 51-75]). Strain-specific RV5 VE differences were less pronounced, and primarily derived from high-income countries. Limited data were available from low-income countries.

CONCLUSIONS:

Vaccine effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 was somewhat lower against nonvaccine than vaccine strains. Ongoing surveillance is important to continue long-term monitoring for strain replacement, particularly in low-income settings where data are limited.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Rotavirus / Rotavirus / Vacinas contra Rotavirus / Eficácia de Vacinas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Rotavirus / Rotavirus / Vacinas contra Rotavirus / Eficácia de Vacinas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article