Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Gilbert, Fiona J; Harris, Scott; Miles, Kenneth A; Weir-McCall, Jonathan R; Qureshi, Nagmi R; Rintoul, Robert Campbell; Dizdarevic, Sabina; Pike, Lucy; Sinclair, Donald; Shah, Andrew; Eaton, Rosemary; Jones, Jeremy; Clegg, Andrew; Benedetto, Valerio; Hill, James; Cook, Andrew; Tzelis, Dimitrios; Vale, Luke; Brindle, Lucy; Madden, Jackie; Cozens, Kelly; Little, Louisa; Eichhorst, Kathrin; Moate, Patricia; McClement, Chris; Peebles, Charles; Banerjee, Anindo; Han, Sai; Poon, Fat-Wui; Groves, Ashley M; Kurban, Lutfi; Frew, Anthony; Callister, Matthew E J; Crosbie, Phil A; Gleeson, Fergus Vincent; Karunasaagarar, Kavitasagary; Kankam, Osei; George, Steve.
Afiliação
  • Gilbert FJ; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK fjg28@cam.ac.uk.
  • Harris S; Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, University of Southampton, Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Miles KA; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
  • Weir-McCall JR; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Qureshi NR; Department of Radiology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Rintoul RC; Department of Radiology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Dizdarevic S; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pike L; Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Sinclair D; Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Shah A; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Eaton R; King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Jones J; King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Clegg A; Radiation Protection, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK.
  • Benedetto V; Radiation Protection, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK.
  • Hill J; Centre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Cook A; Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
  • Tzelis D; Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
  • Vale L; Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
  • Brindle L; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Madden J; Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Cozens K; Population Health Science Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Little L; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Eichhorst K; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Moate P; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • McClement C; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Peebles C; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Banerjee A; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Han S; Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Poon FW; Department of Radiology and Respiratory Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Groves AM; Department of Radiology and Respiratory Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Kurban L; West of Scotland PET Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Frew A; West of Scotland PET Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Callister MEJ; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
  • Crosbie PA; Department of Radiology, Aberdeen Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Gleeson FV; Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Karunasaagarar K; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Kankam O; Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • George S; Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Thorax ; 77(10): 988-996, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887348
INTRODUCTION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) have a high reported accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of these. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre trial, 380 participants with an SPN (8-30 mm) and no recent history of malignancy underwent DCE-CT and PET/CT. All patients underwent either biopsy with histological diagnosis or completed CT follow-up. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy for PET/CT and DCE-CT. Costs and cost-effectiveness were estimated from a healthcare provider perspective using a decision-model. RESULTS: 312 participants (47% female, 68.1±9.0 years) completed the study, with 61% rate of malignancy at 2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for DCE-CT were 95.3% (95% CI 91.3 to 97.5), 29.8% (95% CI 22.3 to 38.4), 68.2% (95% CI 62.4% to 73.5%) and 80.0% (95% CI 66.2 to 89.1), respectively, and for PET/CT were 79.1% (95% CI 72.7 to 84.2), 81.8% (95% CI 74.0 to 87.7), 87.3% (95% CI 81.5 to 91.5) and 71.2% (95% CI 63.2 to 78.1). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for DCE-CT and PET/CT was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.67) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), respectively (p<0.001). Combined results significantly increased diagnostic accuracy over PET/CT alone (AUROC=0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.93), p<0.001). DCE-CT was preferred when the willingness to pay per incremental cost per correctly treated malignancy was below £9000. Above £15 500 a combined approach was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT has a superior diagnostic accuracy to DCE-CT for the diagnosis of SPNs. Combining both techniques improves the diagnostic accuracy over either test alone and could be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02013063.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário / Neoplasias Pulmonares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article