Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury among women who birth vaginally after a prior caesarean section: A state-wide cohort study.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (compared with primiparous women who birth vaginally). However, prior studies have been small or have used outdated methodology. We set out to validate whether the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury among women having their first VBAC is greater than that among primiparous women having a vaginal birth. DESIGN: State-wide retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Victoria, Australia. POPULATION All births (455 000) between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: The risk of severe perineal injury between the first vaginal birth and the first VBAC was compared, after adjustment for potential confounding variables. Covariates were examined using logistic regression for categorical data and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation; the analysis was performed using regression adjustment and stata 16 multiple imputation and suite of effects commands. RESULTS: Women having a VBAC (n = 5429) were significantly more likely than primiparous women (n = 123 353) to sustain a third- or fourth-degree tear during vaginal birth (7.1 versus 5.7%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for mode of birth, body mass index, maternal age, infant birthweight, episiotomy and epidural, there was a 21% increased risk of severe perineal injury (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: Women having their first VBAC have a significantly increased risk of sustaining a third- or fourth-degree tear, compared with primiparous women having a vaginal birth. Patient counselling and professional guidelines should reflect this increased risk.