Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults.
Karmiris, Efthymios; Tsiripidis, Konstantinos; Gartaganis, Panos S; Totou, Styliani; Vasilopoulou, Maria-Giannoula; Patelis, Andreas; Giannakis, Ioannis; Chalkiadaki, Evangelia.
Afiliação
  • Karmiris E; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Tsiripidis K; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Gartaganis PS; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Totou S; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Vasilopoulou MG; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Patelis A; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Giannakis I; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Chalkiadaki E; Department of Ophthalmology, 251 Hellenic Airforce General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; : 11206721211069227, 2021 Dec 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34955039
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the agreement among four types of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements IOP obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (IOP-GAT),IOP obtained by an air-puff tonometer (Nidek NT-510)(IOP-NCT), the non-corrected IOP obtained by the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (IOP-Corvis) and the biomechanically corrected IOP obtained by the Corvis ST (bIOP-Corvis) in healthy patients with a broad spectrum of IOP values.

Methods:

This prospective, observational study recruited 113 healthy individuals. Each patient underwent IOP evaluation via GAT, Nidek NT-510 and Corvis ST. Difference in mean in IOP readings was assessed by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The difference between the four IOP measurements was correlated against corneal (CCT) and age with Pearson's correlation test.

Results:

IOP-Corvis showed the highest values (16.59 ± 3.08 mmHg),followed by IOP-NCT (16.05 ± 3.43 mmHg), IOP-GAT (15.62 ± 3.08 mmHg) and bIOP-Corvis (15.10 ± 2.67 mmHg).There were statistically significant differences in IOP measurements among all the ANOVA pairwise comparisons except between IOP-GAT and bIOP-Corvis (p = 0.07),as well as between IOP-GAT and IOP-NCT (p = 0.25). Bland Altman analysis revealed a notable bias (all p < 0.05) among IOP-GAT and bIOP-Corvis, IOP-GAT and IOP-Corvis, IOP-GAT and IOP-NCT, bIOP-Corvis and IOP-Corvis, bIOP-Corvis and IOP-NCT,IOP-Corvis and IOP-NCT of 0.51, -0.97, -0.43, -1.49, -0.95, 0.53 mmHg respectively. We observed a strong correlation of the difference between bIOP-Corvis and IOP-Corvis with CCT and patient age.

Conclusion:

Compared with GAT and Nidek NT-510, the Corvis-derived IOPs were recorded either the highest as IOP-Corvis or the lowest as bIOP-Corvis. Even if the differences among the tonometers were relatively small, the IOP values obtained with the Corvis ST, NCT and GAT were not interchangeable.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article