Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy and Reliability of Single-Camera Measurements of Ankle Clonus and Quadriceps Hyperreflexia.
Macon, Keith; Hoang, Dustin; Elizondo, Lauren; Kallus, Kerri; Sulzer, James; Manella, Kathleen.
Afiliação
  • Macon K; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Hoang D; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  • Elizondo L; Spero Rehab, Austin, TX.
  • Kallus K; University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, TX.
  • Sulzer J; University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, TX.
  • Manella K; St. David's Rehabilitation Hospital, Austin, TX.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl ; 3(4): 100153, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977536
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a simple, single-camera smartphone-based method, named the Reflex Tracker (RT) system, for measuring reflex threshold angles related to ankle clonus and quadriceps hyperreflexia.

DESIGN:

A prospective comparison study using a high-fidelity reference standard was constructed employing a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design, with factors of rater (tester) type (student and experienced physical therapist), joint (ankle and knee), and repetition (2 per condition).

SETTING:

This multicenter study was conducted at 4 outpatient rehabilitation clinics.

PARTICIPANTS:

A convenience sample of 14 individuals with a neurologic condition presented with 20 lower limbs that exhibited ankle clonus and/or quadriceps hyperreflexia and were included in the study. Also participating in the study were 8 student and 8 experienced physical therapist raters (testers) (N=16).

INTERVENTIONS:

Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The plantar flexor reflex threshold angle (PFRTA) related to ankle clonus and the quadriceps reflex threshold angle (QRTA) related to quadriceps hyperreflexia were quantified.

RESULTS:

PFRTA and QRTA results were compared between the smartphone RT method and synchronous 3-dimensional inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor motion capture. Mean difference (bias) was minimal between RT and IMU measurements for PFRTA (bias≤0.2°) and QRTA (bias≤1.2°). Intrarater reliability for PFRTA ranged from 0.85-0.90 using RT and from 0.85-0.87 using IMU; QRTA ranged from 0.97-0.98 using RT and from 0.96-0.99 using IMU. Intersensor reliability for PFRTA and QRTA was 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Minimum detectable change for PFRTA ranged from 7.1°- 8.7° and for QRTA ranged from 6.1°-8.3°.

CONCLUSIONS:

RT performed comparable to IMU for accurate and reliable measurement of PFRTA and QRTA to quantify ankle clonus and quadriceps hyperreflexia in clinical settings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article