Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Daoust, Raoul; Paquet, Jean; Marquis, Martin; Chauny, Jean-Marc; Williamson, David; Huard, Vérilibe; Arbour, Caroline; Émond, Marcel; Cournoyer, Alexis.
Afiliação
  • Daoust R; Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Paquet J; Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d'Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Marquis M; Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Chauny JM; Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Williamson D; Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Huard V; Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Arbour C; Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d'Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Émond M; Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Cournoyer A; Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(1): e2143425, 2022 01 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35024834
ABSTRACT
Importance Limiting opioid overprescribing in the emergency department (ED) may be associated with decreases in diversion and misuse.

Objective:

To review and analyze interventions designed to reduce the rate of opioid prescriptions or the quantity prescribed for pain in adults discharged from the ED. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials databases and the gray literature were searched from inception to May 15, 2020, with an updated search performed March 6, 2021. Study Selection Intervention studies aimed at reducing opioid prescribing at ED discharge were first screened using titles and abstracts. The full text of the remaining citations was then evaluated against inclusion and exclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Data Extraction and

Synthesis:

Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers who also assessed the risk of bias. Authors were contacted for missing data. The main meta-analysis was accompanied by intervention category subgroup analyses. All meta-analyses used random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using I2 values. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The primary outcome was the variation in opioid prescription rate and/or prescribed quantity associated with the interventions. Effect sizes were computed separately for interrupted time series (ITS) studies.

Results:

Sixty-three unique studies were included in the review, and 45 studies had sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. A statistically significant reduction in the opioid prescription rate was observed for both ITS (6-month step change, -22.61%; 95% CI, -30.70% to -14.52%) and other (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.70) study designs. No statistically significant reduction in prescribed opioid quantities was observed for ITS studies (6-month step change, -8.64%; 95% CI, -17.48% to 0.20%), but a small, statistically significant reduction was observed for other study designs (standardized mean difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.09). For ITS studies, education, policies, and guideline interventions (6-month step change, -33.31%; 95% CI, -39.67% to -26.94%) were better at reducing the opioid prescription rate compared with prescription drug monitoring programs and laws (6-month step change, -11.18%; 95% CI, -22.34% to -0.03%). Most intervention categories did not reduce prescribed opioid quantities. Insufficient data were available on patient-centered outcomes such as pain relief or patients' satisfaction. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found that most interventions reduced the opioid prescription rate but not the prescribed opioid quantity for ED-discharged patients. More studies on patient-centered outcomes and using novel approaches to reduce the opioid quantity per prescription are needed. Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier CRD42020187251.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Padrões de Prática Médica / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos / Analgésicos Opioides Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Padrões de Prática Médica / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos / Analgésicos Opioides Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article