Ethics of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation under Conventional and Crisis Standards of Care.
J Clin Ethics
; 33(1): 13-22, 2022.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35100174
ABSTRACT
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of life support for cardiac and/or pulmonary failure with unique ethical challenges compared to other forms of life support. Ethical challenges with ECMO exist when conventional standards of care apply, and are exacerbated during periods of absolute ECMO scarcity when "crisis standards of care" are instituted. When conventional standards of care apply, we propose that it is ethically permissible to withhold placing patients on ECMO for reasons of technical futility or when patients have terminal, short-term prognoses that are untreatable by ECMO. Under crisis standards of care, it is ethically permissible to broaden exclusionary criteria to also withhold ECMO from patients who have a low likelihood of recovery, to maximize the overall number of lives saved. Unilateral withdrawal of ECMO against a patient's preferences is unethical under conventional standards of care, but is ethical under crisis standards of care to increase access to ECMO to others in society. ECMO should only be rationed when true scarcity exists, and allocation protocols should be transparent to the public. When rationing must occur under crisis standards of care, it is imperative that oversight bodies assess for inequities in the allocation of ECMO and make frequent changes to improve any inequities.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article