Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Femoral Fixation on Revision and Mortality Following Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Over the Age of 65 years. An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry.
Gonzalez Della Valle, Alejandro; Odum, Susan M; De, Ayushmita; Barrington, John W; Huddleston, James I; Illgen, Richard L; Springer, Bryan D.
Afiliação
  • Gonzalez Della Valle A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
  • Odum SM; Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute and OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC.
  • De A; The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL.
  • Barrington JW; Plano Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Center, Plano, TX.
  • Huddleston JI; Joint Replacement Center at Stanford, Redwood City, CA.
  • Illgen RL; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  • Springer BD; OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center and Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(6): 1105-1110, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131391
BACKGROUND: With the overwhelming use of cementless femoral fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty in the United States, the associations of stem fixation on the risk of revision and mortality are poorly understood. We evaluated the relationship between femoral fixation and risk of revision and mortality in patients included in the American Joint Replacement Registry. METHODS: Elective, primary, unilateral total hip arthroplasties in the American Joint Replacement Registry, in patients over the age of 65 years were considered. In total, 9,612 patients with a cemented stem were exact matched 1:1 with patients who received a cementless stem based on age, gender, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Outcomes compared between the groups included need and reason for revision at 90 days and 1 year; in-hospital, 90-day, and 1-year mortality; and mortality after early revision. Covariates were used in linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Cemented fixation was associated with a 37% reduction in the risk of 90-day revision, and a reduction in the risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture of 87% at 90 days and 81% at 1 year. Cemented fixation was associated with increased 90-day and 1-year mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.15, confidence interval [CI] 2.24-4.43 and OR 2.36, CI 1.86-3.01, respectively). Patients who underwent subsequent revision surgery within the first year exhibited the highest mortality risk (OR 3.23, CI 1.05-9.97). CONCLUSION: In this representative sample of the United States, 90-day revision for any reason and for periprosthetic fracture was significantly reduced in patients with a cemented stem. This benefit must be weighed against the association with increased mortality and with the high risk of mortality associated with early revision, which was more prevalent with cementless fixation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Periprotéticas / Prótese de Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas Periprotéticas / Prótese de Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article