Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Hip-Knee Line Angle Distinguish the Size of Pelvic Incidence?-Development of Quick Noninvasive Assessment Tool for Pelvic Incidence Classification.
Yamada, Shota; Ebara, Takeshi; Uehara, Toru; Matsuki, Taro; Kimura, Shingo; Satsukawa, Yuya; Yoshihara, Akira; Aoki, Kazuji; Inada, Atsushi; Kamijima, Michihiro.
Afiliação
  • Yamada S; Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 4678601, Japan.
  • Ebara T; Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 4628508, Japan.
  • Uehara T; Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 4678601, Japan.
  • Matsuki T; Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 4628508, Japan.
  • Kimura S; Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 4678601, Japan.
  • Satsukawa Y; Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 4628508, Japan.
  • Yoshihara A; Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 4628508, Japan.
  • Aoki K; Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 4628508, Japan.
  • Inada A; Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nagoya Gakuin University, Nagoya 4568612, Japan.
  • Kamijima M; Spine Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 4628508, Japan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35162404
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to explore effective measurement angles for pelvic incidence (PI) classification and to develop a quick, noninvasive assessment tool for PI classification. We defined five variation types of hip-knee line (HKL) angles and tested the discrimination ability of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using 125 photographs of upright standing posture from the right lateral side. ROC analysis revealed an applicable HKL angle defined by the line connecting the most raised part of the buttock and the central point of the knee and the midthigh line. The acceptable cut-off points for discriminating small or large PIs in terms of HKL angle were 18.5° for small PI (sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.79) and 21.5° for large PI discrimination (sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.72). In addition, we devised a quick noninvasive assessment tool for PI classification using the cut-offs of the HKL angle with a view to practical application. The results of intra- and inter-rater reliability ensured a substantial/moderate level of the tool (Cohen's kappa coefficient, 0.79; Fleiss's kappa coefficient, 0.50-0.54). These results revealed that the HKL angle can distinguish the size of the PI with a high/moderate discrimination ability. Furthermore, the tool indicated acceptable inter-/intra-rater reliability for practical applications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Extremidade Inferior / Joelho Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Extremidade Inferior / Joelho Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article