Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spatiotemporal Bayesian Regularization for Cardiac Strain Imaging: Simulation and In Vivo Results.
Mukaddim, Rashid Al; Meshram, Nirvedh H; Weichmann, Ashley M; Mitchell, Carol C; Varghese, Tomy.
Afiliação
  • Mukaddim RA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
  • Meshram NH; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
  • Weichmann AM; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
  • Mitchell CC; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706 USA.
  • Varghese T; Small Animal Imaging and Radiotherapy Facility, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI 53705 USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35174360
ABSTRACT
Cardiac strain imaging (CSI) plays a critical role in the detection of myocardial motion abnormalities. Displacement estimation is an important processing step to ensure the accuracy and precision of derived strain tensors. In this paper, we propose and implement Spatiotemporal Bayesian regularization (STBR) algorithms for two-dimensional (2-D) normalized cross-correlation (NCC) based multi-level block matching along with incorporation into a Lagrangian cardiac strain estimation framework. Assuming smooth temporal variation over a short span of time, the proposed STBR algorithm performs displacement estimation using at least four consecutive ultrasound radio-frequency (RF) frames by iteratively regularizing 2-D NCC matrices using information from a local spatiotemporal neighborhood in a Bayesian sense. Two STBR schemes are proposed to construct Bayesian likelihood functions termed as Spatial then Temporal Bayesian (STBR-1) and simultaneous Spatiotemporal Bayesian (STBR-2). Radial and longitudinal strain estimated from a finite-element-analysis (FEA) model of realistic canine myocardial deformation were utilized to quantify strain bias, normalized strain error and total temporal relative error (TTR). Statistical analysis with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that all Bayesian regularization methods significantly outperform NCC with lower bias and errors (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference among Bayesian methods. For example, mean longitudinal TTR for NCC, SBR, STBR-1 and STBR-2 were 25.41%, 9.27%, 10.38% and 10.13% respectively An in vivo feasibility study using RF data from ten healthy mice hearts were used to compare the elastographic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR e ) calculated using stochastic analysis. STBR-2 had the highest expected SNR e both for radial and longitudinal strain. The mean expected SNR e values for accumulated radial strain for NCC, SBR, STBR-1 and STBR-2 were 5.03, 9.43, 9.42 and 10.58, respectively. Overall results suggest that STBR improves CSI in vivo.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article