Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric evaluation of high-Z inhomogeneity used for hip prosthesis: A multi-institutional collaborative study.
Yadav, Poonam; Chang, Sha X; Cheng, Chee-Wai; DesRosiers, Colleen M; Mitra, Raj K; Das, Indra J.
Afiliação
  • Yadav P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
  • Chang SX; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Cheng CW; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 46255, USA.
  • DesRosiers CM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
  • Mitra RK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.
  • Das IJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. Electronic address: indra.das@nm.org.
Phys Med ; 95: 148-155, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35182937
PURPOSE: A multi-institutional investigation for dosimetric evaluation of high-Z hip prosthetic device in photon beam. METHODS: A bilateral hip prosthetic case was chosen. An in-house phantom was built to replicate the human pelvis with two different prostheses. Dosimetric parameters: dose to the target and organs at risk (OARs) were compared for the clinical case generated by various treatment planning system (TPS) with varied algorithms. Single beam plans with different TPS for phantom using 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams with and without density correction were compared with measurement. RESULTS: Wide variations in target and OAR dosimetry were recorded for different TPS. For clinical case ideal PTV coverage was noted for plans generated with Corvus and Prowess TPS only. However, none of the TPS were able to meet plan objective for the bladder. Good correlation was noticed for the measured and the Pinnacle TPS for corrected dose calculation at the interfaces as well as the dose ratio in elsewhere. On comparing measured and calculated dose, the difference across the TPS varied from -20% to 60% for 6 MV and 3% to 50% for the 15 MV, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most TPS do not provide accurate dosimetry with high-Z prosthesis. It is important to check the TPS under extreme conditions of beams passing through the high-Z region. Metal artifact reduction algorithms may reduce the difference between the measured and calculated dose but still significant differences exist. Further studies are required to validate the calculational accuracy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Prótese de Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Prótese de Quadril Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article