Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility, psychological outcomes and practical use of a stress-preventive leadership intervention in the workplace hospital: the results of a mixed-method phase-II study.
Stuber, Felicitas; Seifried-Dübon, Tanja; Tsarouha, Elena; Rahmani Azad, Zahra; Erschens, Rebecca; Armbruster, Ines; Schnalzer, Susanne; Mulfinger, Nadine; Müller, Andreas; Angerer, Peter; Helaß, Madeleine; Maatouk, Imad; Nikendei, Christoph; Ruhle, Sascha; Puschner, Bernd; Gündel, Harald; Rieger, Monika A; Zipfel, Stephan; Junne, Florian.
Afiliação
  • Stuber F; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany felicitas.stuber@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
  • Seifried-Dübon T; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Tsarouha E; Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Rahmani Azad Z; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Erschens R; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Armbruster I; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Schnalzer S; Echt:Zeit Coaching, Esslingen, Germany.
  • Mulfinger N; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
  • Müller A; Institute of Psychology, Work and Organisational Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Angerer P; Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Helaß M; Department for General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Maatouk I; Department for General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Nikendei C; Department for General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ruhle S; Chair of Business Administration, Human Resource Management and Organisation Studies, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Puschner B; Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Gündel H; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
  • Rieger MA; Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Zipfel S; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Junne F; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e049951, 2022 02 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197332
OBJECTIVES: Hospitals are psychologically demanding workplaces with a need for context-specific stress-preventive leadership interventions. A stress-preventive interprofessional leadership intervention for middle management has been developed. This phase-II study investigates its feasibility and outcomes, including work-related stress, well-being and transformational leadership. DESIGN: This is a mixed-methods study with three measure points (T0: baseline, T1: after the last training session, T2: 3-month follow-up). Additionally, focus groups were conducted to assess participants' change in everyday work. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: N=93 leaders of different professions. INTERVENTION: An interactive group setting intervention divided in five separate sessions ((1) self-care as a leader, (2) leadership attitudes and behaviour, (3) motives, needs and stressors of employees, (4) strengthen the resource 'team', (5) reflection and focus groups). The intervention was conducted between June 2018 and March 2020 in k=5 runs of the intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility and acceptance were measured with a self-developed intervention specific questionnaire. Psychological outcomes were assessed with the following scales: work-related strain with the Irritation Scale, well-being with the WHO-5 Well-being Index and transformational leadership with the Questionnaire of Integrative Leadership. RESULTS: After the intervention at T2, over 90% of participants reported that they would recommend the intervention to another coworker (92.1%, n=59) and all participants (n=64) were satisfied with the intervention and rated the intervention as practical relevant for their everyday work. Participants' self-rated cognitive irritation was reduced, whereas their well-being and transformational leadership behaviour were improved over time. Focus group discussions revealed that participants implemented intervention contents successfully in their everyday work. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention was feasible and showed first promising intraindividual changes in psychological outcomes. Participants confirmed its practical relevance. As a next step, the intervention will be evaluated as part of a multicentre-randomised controlled trial within the project SEEGEN (SEElische GEsundheit am Arbeitsplatz KrankeNhaus).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Local de Trabalho / Liderança Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Local de Trabalho / Liderança Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article