Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapeutic Misconception about Research Procedures: Does a Simple Information Chart Improve Understanding?
Campbell, Gavin; Dixon, Margie D; Lohani, Minisha; Cook, John; Hianik, Rachel; Thomson, Mary Catherine; Abernethy, Eli; Lewis, Colleen; Switchenko, Jeffrey; Harvey, R Donald; Pentz, Rebecca D.
Afiliação
  • Campbell G; Research assistant at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.
  • Dixon MD; Supervisor and project coordinator at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.
  • Lohani M; Internal medicine resident at the Stony Brook University School of Medicine.
  • Cook J; Medical student at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences School of Medicine.
  • Hianik R; Medical student at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.
  • Thomson MC; Medical student at the Medical College of Georgia.
  • Abernethy E; Medical student at Duke University School of Medicine.
  • Lewis C; Nurse practitioner at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.
  • Switchenko J; Statistician at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University.
  • Harvey RD; Phase I director at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.
  • Pentz RD; Professor of research ethics at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.
Ethics Hum Res ; 44(2): 18-25, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218599
ABSTRACT
In phase I trials, some biospecimens are used both for research and patient care and some for research only. Some research participants have therapeutic misconception, assuming all biospecimens are for patient care. This study's aim was to test if a simple information chart would improve understanding of nontherapeutic research procedures. A two-arm study was conducted. Participants in the control group (C) were asked whether biospecimens were for their care, for research only, or for both. The experimental group (E) was asked the same questions but provided with a study-specific information chart labeling the purpose of each biospecimen. One hundred one patients were interviewed. In both arms, understanding that pretreatment blood draws were for patient care and research was moderate (49% for C and 62% for E). Understanding that posttreatment blood draws were for research only was significantly higher in the experimental arm (16% for C and 44% for E; p = 0.002). Providing a simple information chart may help alleviate this aspect of therapeutic misconception.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mal-Entendido Terapêutico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mal-Entendido Terapêutico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article