Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Institutional Review Board Use of Outside Experts: What Do We Know?
Serpico, Kimberley; Rahimzadeh, Vasiliki; Anderson, Emily E; Gelinas, Luke; Lynch, Holly Fernandez.
Afiliação
  • Serpico K; Associate director of IRB operations in the Office of Regulatory Affairs and Research Compliance at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and an EdD candidate at Vanderbilt University.
  • Rahimzadeh V; Postdoctoral fellow and scholar at the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics at Stanford University.
  • Anderson EE; Associate professor at the Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics in the Stritch School of Medicine at Loyola University Chicago.
  • Gelinas L; Chairperson at Advarra IRB and a senior advisor at The Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard.
  • Lynch HF; John Russell Dickson, MD, Presidential Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
Ethics Hum Res ; 44(2): 26-32, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218600
Institutional review boards (IRBs) are permitted by regulation to seek assistance from outside experts when reviewing research applications that are beyond the scope of expertise represented in their membership. There is insufficient understanding, however, of when, why, and how IRBs consult with outside experts, as this practice has not been the primary focus of any published literature or empirical study to date. These issues have important implications for IRB quality. The capacity IRBs have to fulfill their mission of protecting research participants without unduly hindering research is influenced by IRBs' access to and use of the right type of expertise to review challenging research ethics, regulatory, and scientific issues. Through a review of the regulations and standards permitting IRBs to draw on the competencies of outside experts and through examination of the needs, strategies, challenges, and concerns related to doing so, we identify critical gaps in the existing literature and set forth an agenda for future empirical research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa / Pesquisa Biomédica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa / Pesquisa Biomédica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article