Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Choosing Wisely Canada: Canadian fertility and andrology society's list of top items physicians and patients should question in fertility medicine.
Jones, C A; Hawkins, L; Friedman, Catherine; Hitkari, J; McMahon, E; Born, K B.
Afiliação
  • Jones CA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.
  • Hawkins L; Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 700-250 Dundas Street West, Toronto, ON, M5T 2Z5, Canada.
  • Friedman C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.
  • Hitkari J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Humber River Hospital, 1235 Wilson Ave, North York, ON, M3M 0B2, Canada.
  • McMahon E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada. catherine.friedman@medportal.ca.
  • Born KB; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, 930-1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2K8, Canada.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(1): 267-275, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278119
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To create a Choosing Wisely Canada list of the top 5 diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that should be questioned in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility in Canada.

METHODS:

The Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) National Working Group developed an initial list of recommendations of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that are commonly used, but are not supported by evidence, and could expose patients to unnecessary harm. These were chosen based on their prevalence, cost, potential for harm, and quality of supporting evidence. A modified Delphi consensus was used over 5 rounds to generate ideas, review supporting evidence, assess clinical relevance, estimate recommendation impact and narrow the recommendations list to 5 items.

RESULTS:

Fifty unique ideas were first proposed by the working group, and after 5 rounds including a survey of Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society (CFAS) members, the final list of recommendations was created, including topics related to unnecessary investigations and interventions for patients with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss, and those undergoing IVF. In this article, we describe not only the Delphi process used to determine the list, but also provide a summary of the evidence behind each of the final recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS:

The list of five recommendations highlights opportunities to initiate conversations between clinicians and patients about the risks, benefits, harms and costs of unnecessary fertility treatments and procedures in a Canadian context.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Andrologia / Infertilidade Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Andrologia / Infertilidade Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article