Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of lacrimal duct probing in adults with 0.02% and 0.04% mitomycin-C in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: A randomized comparative pilot study.
Saini, Manu; Bajaj, Mandeep Singh; Pushker, Neelam; Meel, Rachna; Saini, Kulbhushan; Chaurasia, Shweta; Mehta, Aditi.
Afiliação
  • Saini M; Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Bajaj MS; Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Pushker N; Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Meel R; Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Saini K; Department of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Chaurasia S; Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Mehta A; Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Oman J Ophthalmol ; 15(1): 56-60, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35388249
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive use of mitomycin-C (MMC) using two different concentrations 0.2 mg/ml and 0.4 mg/ml for lacrimal duct probing to treat the nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in adults. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

Prospective, an interventional comparative randomized pilot study of lacrimal duct probing conducted in the two study groups 0.02% MMC group (n = 30) and 0.04% MMC group (n = 30) in confirmed primary acquired NLDO of <1-year duration. Patency of lacrimal duct probing confirmed by syringing was compared at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up in the two study groups, and corresponding subjective improvement of watering was appraised according to Kraft and Crawford grading.

RESULTS:

Patency of lacrimal duct probing in 0.02% MMC versus 0.04% MMC group was 66.66%/73.33% (P = 0.71) at 1 month, 46.66%/66.66% (P = 0.09) at 3 months and 46.66%/66.66% (P = 0.03) at 6-month follow-up, respectively. Subjective improvement of watering (no watering and mild watering) observed in 0.02% MMC versus 0.04% MMC group was 46.66%/73.33% (P = 0.03), at 1 month, 66.66%/83.33% (P = 0.13) at 3 months and 56.66%/73.33% (P = 0.17) at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION:

Adult lacrimal duct probing with 0.04% MMC was associated with significant higher objective success rate than adult lacrimal duct probing with 0.02% MMC, without added concurrently side effects.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article