Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Introduction of the Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve System Use in Elderly Patients With Endocarditis.
Öner, Alper; Hemmer, Christoph; Alozie, Anthony; Löser, Benjamin; Dohmen, Pascal M.
Afiliação
  • Öner A; Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Hemmer C; Department of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Alozie A; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Löser B; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Dohmen PM; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 774189, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35391848
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The rapid-deployment valve system (RDVS) was introduced to facility minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. In this study we evaluate the potential benefits of RDVS in elderly high-risk patients with endocarditis of the aortic valve. Materials and

Methods:

Since the introduction of RDVS in our institution in December 2017 through October 2021, EDWARDS INTUITY rapid-deployment prosthesis (Model 8300A, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) has been implanted in a total of 115 patients for different indications by a single surgeon. Out of one-hundred and fifteen cases of RDVS implantation, seven patients with a median age of 77 yrs. (range 62-84yrs.), suffered from active infective endocarditis of the aortic valve. The median EuroSCORE II of these highly selected patient cohort was 77% (range 19-80%). Patient data were evaluated perioperatively including intra-operative data as well as in-hospital morbidity/mortality and follow-up after discharge from hospital.

Results:

Three patients underwent previous cardiac surgery. Concomitant procedures were performed in six patients including, ascending aorta replacement (n = 3), mitral valve repair (n = 1), pulmonary valve replacement (n = 1), bypass surgery (n = 1), left atrial appendix resection (n = 1) and anterior mitral valve repair (n = 1). Median aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time was 56 min (range 29-122 min) and 81 min (range 45-162 min.), respectively. Post-operative complications in these elderly high-risk patients were atrial fibrillation (n = 3) and re-exploration for pericardial effusion (n = 1). One pacemaker implantation was required on postoperative day 6 due to sick sinus syndrome. There was one in-hospital death (14%) and one during follow-up (14%).

Conclusion:

Rapid-deployment aortic valve system seems to be a viable option with acceptable morbidity and mortality in elderly high-risk patients with active infective endocarditis of the aortic valve.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article