Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
International multi-centre study of potential benefits of ultraviolet radiation protection using contact lenses.
Wolffsohn, James S; Dhallu, Sandeep; Aujla, Maana; Laughton, Debbie; Tempany, Keith; Powell, Daniel; Gifford, Kate; Gifford, Paul; Wan, Kin; Cho, Pauline; Stahl, Ulrike; Woods, Jill.
Afiliação
  • Wolffsohn JS; Aston University, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: j.s.w.wolffsohn@aston.ac.uk.
  • Dhallu S; Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  • Aujla M; Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  • Laughton D; Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  • Tempany K; Leightons and Tempany, Poole, UK.
  • Powell D; University of Houston, Texas, USA; Southern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Gifford K; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Gifford P; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Wan K; Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
  • Cho P; Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
  • Stahl U; University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  • Woods J; University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 45(6): 101593, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35431131
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To examine the effects of long-term ultraviolet radiation (UVR) blocking wearing contact lenses on ocular surface health, eye focus and macular pigment.

METHOD:

210 pre-presbyopic patients were recruited from Birmingham UK, Brisbane Australia, Hong Kong China, Houston USA and Waterloo Canada (n = 42 at each site). All patients had worn contact lenses for ≥ 5 years, half (test group) of a material incorporating a UVR-blocking filter. Ocular health was assessed using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and UV autofluorescence. Accommodation was measured subjectively with a push-up test and overcoming lens-induced defocus. Objective stimulus response and dynamic measures of the accommodative response were quantified with an open-field aberrometer. Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) was assessed using heterochromatic flicker photometry (MPS II).

RESULTS:

The two groups of participants were matched for age, sex, race, body-mass-index, diet, lifestyle, UVR exposure, refractive error and visual acuity. Limbal (p = 0.035), but not bulbar conjunctival redness (p = 0.903) was lower in eyes that had worn UVR-blocking contact lenses compared to controls. The subjective (8.0 ± 3.7D vs 7.3 ± 3.3D; p = 0.125) and objective (F = 1.255, p = 0.285) accommodative response was higher in the test group, but the differences did not reach significance. However, the accommodative latency was shorter in eyes that had worn UVR-blocking contact lenses (p = 0.003). There was no significant different in MPOD with UVR filtration (p = 0.869).

CONCLUSIONS:

Blocking the transmission of UVR is beneficial in maintaining the eye's ability to focus, suggesting that presbyopia maybe delayed in long-term UVR-blocking contact lenses wearers. These lenses also provide protection to the critical limbal region.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Lentes de Contato / Pigmento Macular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Lentes de Contato / Pigmento Macular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article