Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
R-wave amplitude changes with posture and physical activity over time in an insertable cardiac monitor.
Swale, Matthew; Delacroix, Sinny; Young, Glenn; Paul, Vincent; McSpadden, Luke; Ryu, Kyungmoo; Di Fiore, David; Santos, Maria; Tan, Isabel; Conradie, Andre; Duong, MyNgan; Schwarz, Nisha; Worthley, Stephen; Pavia, Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Swale M; The Valley Private Hospital, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia.
  • Delacroix S; Abbott, Sylmar, California.
  • Young G; GenesisCare, Leabrook, South Australia, Australia.
  • Paul V; St. Andrew's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • McSpadden L; St. John of God Murdoch Hospital, Murdoch, Queensland, Australia.
  • Ryu K; Abbott, Sylmar, California.
  • Di Fiore D; Abbott, Sylmar, California.
  • Santos M; Friendly Society Private Hospital, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.
  • Tan I; St. Andrew's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Conradie A; Perth Mount, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Duong M; Friendly Society Private Hospital, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.
  • Schwarz N; GenesisCare, Leabrook, South Australia, Australia.
  • Worthley S; GenesisCare, Leabrook, South Australia, Australia.
  • Pavia S; St. Andrew's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Cardiovasc Digit Health J ; 3(2): 80-88, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35493270
ABSTRACT

Background:

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are accepted tools in cardiac arrhythmia management. Consistent R-wave amplitude (RWA) is essential for optimal detection.

Objectives:

Assess RWAs with posture/activities at insertion and at 30 days.

Methods:

Participants (n = 90) with Confirm Rx™ ICM had RWAs measured in different postures (supine, right-side [RS], left-side [LS], sitting, and standing) and defined physical activities (including isometric push [IPUSH] and pull) at 2 time points. ICMs were inserted in 45° to sternum and parasternal orientations.

Results:

There were significant reductions at insertion with RS, LS, sitting, or standing vs supine (reference position) (all P < .05). At 30 days, significant changes only occurred with LS and sitting (P < .05). Sex had an effect on RWAs, with females having significant variability at insertion (supine vs RS, LS, sitting, standing, and IPUSH; all P < .05). Males showed large RWA interpatient variabilities but minimal differences between positions vs supine. At 30 days, RS, LS, and sitting positions remained significant for females (P < .05), while in males RWAs were higher than at insertion for most postures and activities. The orientation 45° to sternum had consistently higher RWAs vs parasternal orientation at both time points (P < .0001). In females, ICM orientation had no significant effect on RWAs; however, in males the 45° to sternum produced higher RWAs. ICM movement from the insertion site showed no correlation with RWA changes.

Conclusion:

The mean RWAs were higher at 30 days with less interparticipant and interpostural variability; males had higher RWAs compared to females; 45° to sternum orientation had higher RWAs; and ICM migration from the insertion site did not affect RWAs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article