Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people.
Ong, Terence; Suazo Di Paola, Ana; Brookes, Cassandra; Drummond, Avril; Hendrick, Paul; Leighton, Paul; Jones, Matthew; Salem, Khalid; Quraishi, Nasir; Sahota, Opinder.
Afiliação
  • Ong T; Department of Healthcare for Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK terenceong@doctors.org.uk.
  • Suazo Di Paola A; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Brookes C; Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Drummond A; Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Hendrick P; Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Leighton P; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Jones M; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Salem K; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Quraishi N; Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
  • Sahota O; Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e050535, 2022 05 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35504639
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. SETTING: A UK tertiary centre hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events. RESULTS: 241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16719542.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas de Estresse / Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas de Estresse / Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article