Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere.
Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y; Steyerberg, Ewout W; Lingsma, Hester F.
Afiliação
  • Gravesteijn BY; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands. b.gravesteijn@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Steyerberg EW; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Lingsma HF; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Neurocrit Care ; 37(Suppl 2): 174-184, 2022 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35513752
Large and complex data sets are increasingly available for research in critical care. To analyze these data, researchers use techniques commonly referred to as statistical learning or machine learning (ML). The latter is known for large successes in the field of diagnostics, for example, by identification of radiological anomalies. In other research areas, such as clustering and prediction studies, there is more discussion regarding the benefit and efficiency of ML techniques compared with statistical learning. In this viewpoint, we aim to explain commonly used statistical learning and ML techniques and provide guidance for responsible use in the case of clustering and prediction questions in critical care. Clustering studies have been increasingly popular in critical care research, aiming to inform how patients can be characterized, classified, or treated differently. An important challenge for clustering studies is to ensure and assess generalizability. This limits the application of findings in these studies toward individual patients. In the case of predictive questions, there is much discussion as to what algorithm should be used to most accurately predict outcome. Aspects that determine usefulness of ML, compared with statistical techniques, include the volume of the data, the dimensionality of the preferred model, and the extent of missing data. There are areas in which modern ML methods may be preferred. However, efforts should be made to implement statistical frameworks (e.g., for dealing with missing data or measurement error, both omnipresent in clinical data) in ML methods. To conclude, there are important opportunities but also pitfalls to consider when performing clustering or predictive studies with ML techniques. We advocate careful valuation of new data-driven findings. More interaction is needed between the engineer mindset of experts in ML methods, the insight in bias of epidemiologists, and the probabilistic thinking of statisticians to extract as much information and knowledge from data as possible, while avoiding harm.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Big Data Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Big Data Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article