Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity of the Medi-StuNTS behavioural marker system: assessing the non-technical skills of medical students during immersive simulation.
Phillips, Emma Claire; Smith, Samantha Eve; Clarke, Benjamin; Hamilton, Ailsa Lauren; Kerins, Joanne; Hofer, Johanna; Tallentire, Victoria Ruth.
Afiliação
  • Phillips EC; Scottish Centre for Simulation and Clinical Human Factors, Larbert, UK.
  • Smith SE; NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Clarke B; The University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hamilton AL; The University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Kerins J; NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hofer J; NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Tallentire VR; NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35521075
ABSTRACT

Background:

The Medical Students' Non-Technical Skills (Medi-StuNTS) behavioural marker system (BMS) is the first BMS to be developed specifically for medical students to facilitate training in non-technical skills (NTS) within immersive simulated acute care scenarios. In order to begin implementing the tool in practice, validity evidence must be sought. We aimed to assess the validity of the Medi-StuNTS system with reference to Messick's contemporary validity framework.

Methods:

Two raters marked video-recorded performances of acute care simulation scenarios using the Medi-StuNTS system. Three groups were marked third-year and fourth-year medical students (novices), final-year medical students (intermediates) and core medical trainees (experts). The scores were used to make assessments of relationships to the variable of clinical experience through expert-novice comparisons, inter-rater reliability, observability, exploratory factor analysis, inter-rater disagreements and differential item functioning.

Results:

A significant difference was found between the three groups (p<0.005), with experts scoring significantly better than intermediates (p<0.005) and intermediates scoring significantly better than novices (p=0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between the two raters' scores (r=0.79), and an inter-rater disagreement of more than one point in less than one-fifth of cases. Across all scenarios, 99.7% of skill categories and 84% of skill elements were observable. Factor analysis demonstrated appropriate grouping of skill elements. Inconsistencies in test performance across learner groups were shown specifically in the skill categories of situation awareness and decision making and prioritisation.

Conclusion:

We have demonstrated evidence for several aspects of validity of the Medi-StuNTS system when assessing medical students' NTS during immersive simulation. We can now begin to introduce this system into simulation-based education to maximise NTS training in this group.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article