Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation.
Cornaz, Frédéric; Fasser, Marie-Rosa; Snedeker, Jess Gerrit; Spirig, José Miguel; Farshad, Mazda; Widmer, Jonas.
Afiliação
  • Cornaz F; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Fasser MR; Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Snedeker JG; Spine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Spirig JM; Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Farshad M; Spine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Widmer J; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 7621, 2022 05 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35538122
ABSTRACT
Posterior screw-rod constructs can be used to stabilize spinal segments; however, the stiffness is not absolute, and some motion can persist. While the effect of crosslink-augmentation has been evaluated in multiple studies, the fundamental explanation of their effectiveness has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to quantify the parameters "screw rotation" and "parallelogram deformation" in posterior instrumentations with and without crosslinks to analyze and explain their fundamental effect. Biomechanical testing of 15 posteriorly instrumented human spinal segments (Th10/11-L4/L5) was conducted in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion-extension with ± 7.5 Nm. Screw rotation and parallelogram deformation were compared for both configurations. Parallelogram deformation occurred predominantly during axial rotation (2.6°) and was reduced by 60% (-1.45°, p = 0.02) by the addition of a crosslink. Simultaneously, screw rotation (0.56°) was reduced by 48% (-0.27°, p = 0.02) in this loading condition. During lateral bending, 0.38° of parallelogram deformation and 1.44° of screw rotation was measured and no significant reduction was achieved by crosslink-augmentation (8%, -0.03°, -p = 0.3 and -13%, -0.19°, p = 0.7 respectively). During flexion-extension, parallelogram deformation was 0.4° and screw rotation was 0.39° and crosslink-augmentation had no significant effect on these values (-0.12°, -30%, p = 0.5 and -0°, -0%, p = 0.8 respectively). In axial rotation, crosslink-augmentation can reduce parallelogram deformation and with that, screw rotation. In lateral bending and flexion-extension parallelogram deformation is minimal and crosslink-augmentation has no significant effect. Since the relatively large screw rotation in lateral bending is not caused by parallelogram deformation, crosslink-augmentation is no adequate countermeasure. The fundamental understanding of the biomechanical effect of crosslink-augmentation helps better understand its potential and limitations in increasing construct stiffness.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Parafusos Ósseos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Parafusos Ósseos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article